Bill Wohler wrote:
> If you're already using Emacs, MH-E is a clear winner :-).
I adore MH-E! I tried Wanderlust recently, due to its ability to
interact with IMAP accounts. I gave up on it due to slowness and awkward
keystroke assignment.
There are things that do work a little better in Wanderl
otah...@gmx.ca writes:
>Could you please give a brief assesment of each, based on your experience?
It's been so many years since I last used xmh that I doubt I could give
an accurate assessment of it. But like you say, it's obsolete nowadays
anyway.
I use exmh as my main front end. It's buggy,
otah...@gmx.ca writes:
> First of all, thanks to all of you guys on this mailing list. I am
> learning a lot.
> I hope you will excuse my many questions.
>
> I was happy to find out, from Ken's last email, that there is yet
> another front-end for nmh whose existence I did not know of: MH-V by
> S
Ken Hornstein writes:
>>I have decided to learn the MH system and use it for all my
>>(non-professional) email needs.
>> From what I understand, there are two different modern-day incarnations
>>of MH: nmh and GNU mailutils.
>>I need your advice because I can't make up my mind on which to choos
