mts.conf lets one select which smtp server(s) to use for
mail submission, but there's no convenient way of selecting
port 587 instead of 25.
it would be great if one could set the port with the server entry,
e.g. servers: this.one:587
regards
az
--
Alexander Zangerl + GPG Key 0xB963BD5F (or
Ken Hornstein wrote:
So, right now, the only way to make it work is as you've discovered;
always use $MHSHOW. I am sure this will be fixed for the next nmh
release (when that will happen, I do not know; hopefully it will be
sooner than 2 years, but I can't make any promises). I suspect a
Ken Hornstein wrote:
You're not missing anything. Pretty much everyone agrees this is backwards.
Good. That makes me feel a lot bettern.
Oliver Kiddle writes:
The other way is to store your default entries in a file named
mhn.defaults in your Mail directory. I've had them there for years
On 25 June 2014 at 18:51, Alexander Zangerl e...@bin.snafu.priv.atwrote:
mts.conf lets one select which smtp server(s) to use for
mail submission, but there's no convenient way of selecting
port 587 instead of 25.
I'm curious, how one would then pass the necessary userid/pw combination.
The other way is to store your default entries in a file named
mhn.defaults in your Mail directory. I've had them there for years
(roughly since the days when Richard Coleman was working on nmh) and
had largely forgotten why they were there.
Oooh. That's exactly what I want to happen. Thank you
On the other hand, the idea, of using a non-zero exit code for a non-failure,
spooks me, for largely irrational reasons.
I can understand that feeling, but this is common usage. E.g., Bourne
shell conditional statements.
--Ken
___
Nmh-workers mailing
I requested this feature, for sortm, back in March. There was some discussion
of what the switches should be called, but I had the impression, that the
basic idea was accepted. However, it seems that the feature didn't make it
into nmh 1.6.
So I repeat the request for version 7.
Norman
Date:Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:03:37 -0700
From:n...@dad.org
Message-ID: 201406251503.s5pf3cka001...@shell0.rawbw.com
| Yes, I was thinking of of a fork/exec for each message pair, for which
| sortm wanted a comparison.
| [..] The variation you propose would make
