Norm wrote:
> Now I am getting an infinite stream of messages like the attached.
> How do I stop the stream. This happened to me once before.
Stop postfix?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2013-02/msg00022.html
Would Fcc: instead of "cc: norm" prevent the infinite loop?
send -ms
Now I am getting an infinite stream of messages like the attached.
How do I stop the stream.
This happened to me once before. Somebody told me what to do, but I
can't find the thread.
Norman Shapiro
--- Begin Message ---
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A mess
ralph wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> > if you specify a part with -part, it will definitely selected to
> > appear in the output. as in the current codebase, -type switches
> > apply to parts already selected with -part (or all parts, in the
> > absence of -part) -- i.e., they act as a further filte
Hi Paul,
> if you specify a part with -part, it will definitely selected to
> appear in the output. as in the current codebase, -type switches
> apply to parts already selected with -part (or all parts, in the
> absence of -part) -- i.e., they act as a further filter.
...
> comments?
You're the
i've implemented what i think is the right behavior for -part and -type.
the only real change (i think) from past behavior (besides the bug
fix that i set out to take care of) is that if you specify a part
with -part, it will definitely selected to appear in the output.
as in the current codebase,
>Who designed it? If I ever knew, I've forgotten. I'm guessing that the answer
>is that nobody designed it. It probably started out as a simple take-off of
>printf and grew by small, imperceptible increments from there. I urge that
>this generation of developers not add any more increments, but inv
If we had infinite volunteer resources, what about creating a
completely new (and unified across all of MH) language? It would
be accessed through a new file other than .mh_profile -- say,
.mh_new_profile, but better named. B-)
This was the motivation for the lmh branch in the git repo. This
On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 22:08:54 -0500 Ken Hornstein sez:
> >Maybe someone can see what I'm doing stupidly here as I'm
> >going blind. I have some folders that have ? messages
> >that I don't want to break up, so I want to go to a 5 digit
> >message number in scan
>
> Others have already answer
