Re: Hiding one's email source username/hostname/ISP

2021-03-10 Thread Jerry Heyman
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:34:21 -0500, Ken Hornstein wrote: > >by putting the following entries in my mts.conf > > > >localname: hobbeshollow.com > >masquerade: draft_from mmailid username_extension > > Just FYI ... we got rid of all masquerade support ... 9 years ago? > Definitely in nmh 1.4. Now

Re: Hiding one's email source username/hostname/ISP

2021-03-10 Thread Ken Hornstein
>by putting the following entries in my mts.conf > >localname: hobbeshollow.com >masquerade: draft_from mmailid username_extension Just FYI ... we got rid of all masquerade support ... 9 years ago? Definitely in nmh 1.4. Now, we didn't get rid of the FUNCTIONALITY. Basically there were all these

Re: Is nmh suitable for managing multiple email accounts?

2021-03-10 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Michael, > The problem with SPF records and local SMTP relays is when you have a > google, yahoo, etc. account. Your SMTP relay will not be listed in > their SPF record, and so your emails *will* be marked as forgeries. Is that correct? If I write an email with nmh here which claims to be fr

Re: Hiding one's email source username/hostname/ISP

2021-03-10 Thread Jerry Heyman
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:53:34 -0500, David Levine wrote: > Bob wrote: > > > I do see in the headers of your reply that the first "Received:" > > header uses "HiddenHostname" ... but also the FQDM(?) of your > > Verizon connection > > FQDN, in this case for a dynamically assigned address so not v

Re: Hiding one's email source username/hostname/ISP

2021-03-10 Thread David Levine
Bob wrote: > I do see in the headers of your reply that the first "Received:" > header uses "HiddenHostname" ... but also the FQDM(?) of your > Verizon connection FQDN, in this case for a dynamically assigned address so not very useful to anyone other than Verizon. Though they choose to provide

Re: Hiding one's email source username/hostname/ISP

2021-03-10 Thread Ken Hornstein
>Ken: I would not be opposed to documenting this particular >undocumented switch, though I can imagine why it was left >undocumented in the first place. Well, ABOUT that. While it seems that -client was never documented, clientname (in mts.conf) was always documented, but not very well, back in

Re: Hiding one's email source username/hostname/ISP

2021-03-10 Thread Bob Carragher
(I've combined replies, but used the message ID of Tom's first reply; hopefully that doesn't break the archive. B-) Thank you Tom, David, Krullen, and Ken, for your helpful replies! Tom: good point about false-looking Received: headers! I definitely want to avoid making my email look even more