Re: Unsupported nroff macros on MacOS X

2023-04-02 Thread George Michaelson
Apologies. enter (send) before typing. on FreeBSD 13.1 fc [delimchar [padchar]]Define a delimiting and a padding character for fields. Currently unsupported. Also, fc is not recognised in mdoc as far as I can tell. A different mechanism might be needed no matter what. in which case,

Re: Unsupported nroff macros on MacOS X

2023-04-02 Thread George Michaelson
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 3:43 PM Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > Ken Hornstein writes: > > - Switch to tbl(1) macros which as far as I can tell are supported by > > mandoc and seem to work everywhere. > > tbl is supported by mandoc, yes. In my opinion, this is the best option. > Well, converting to

Re: Unsupported nroff macros on MacOS X

2023-04-02 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Ken Hornstein writes: > - Switch to tbl(1) macros which as far as I can tell are supported by > mandoc and seem to work everywhere. tbl is supported by mandoc, yes. In my opinion, this is the best option. Well, converting to mdoc macros would be nicer, but also much more work, and who would do

Re: Unsupported nroff macros on MacOS X

2023-04-02 Thread Greg Minshall
Ken, > I will admit that my roff-fu is not very good, but I took a look at this. > It seems this is a common idiom for nmh man pages. Specifically (this > is from packf(1) but it's similar everywhere else): any roff-fu i had expired at my last birthday. i've recently switched to use asciidoc,

Re: Unsupported nroff macros on MacOS X

2023-04-02 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Sun, 02 Apr 2023 18:59:03 -0400 From:Ken Hornstein Message-ID: <20230402225904.db62e187...@pb-smtp2.pobox.com> | Given my druthers I think I'd rather do the last one, since this kind | of seems like a table! I would do it that way (now) too, either that

Re: mhl nocomponent

2023-04-02 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Sun, 02 Apr 2023 11:44:23 -0700 From:Jon Steinhart Message-ID: <202304021844.332iin922005...@darkstar.fourwinds.com> | It does seem like the size of the headers exceeds the size of the body | in a lot of cases :-) Like in this message from you ... even

Re: mhl nocomponent

2023-04-02 Thread Ken Hornstein
>It does seem like the size of the headers exceeds the size of the body >in a lot of cases :-) I mean ... yes? Doesn't seem like there's much we can do about that unfortunately. --Ken

Unsupported nroff macros on MacOS X

2023-04-02 Thread Ken Hornstein
So I noticed that after an upgrade to MacOS X, I started getting this warning on certain nmh man pages: This manpage is not compatible with mandoc(1) and might display incorrectly. After some digging, it turns out man(1) is a shell script and to make a long story short is running this command:

Re: mhl nocomponent

2023-04-02 Thread Jon Steinhart
Ken Hornstein writes: > >I use MH-E, which does it's header display/hiding outside of MH. In > >general, I like to see extra headers, but they have gotten way out of > >hand from the MS/Outlook space. We probably need a better list of > >common "this is junk" header list that probably has to

Re: mhl nocomponent

2023-04-02 Thread Ken Hornstein
>I use MH-E, which does it's header display/hiding outside of MH. In >general, I like to see extra headers, but they have gotten way out of >hand from the MS/Outlook space. We probably need a better list of >common "this is junk" header list that probably has to have wildcards in >it. Sigh. I

Re: mhl nocomponent

2023-04-02 Thread Michael Richardson
I use MH-E, which does it's header display/hiding outside of MH. In general, I like to see extra headers, but they have gotten way out of hand from the MS/Outlook space. We probably need a better list of common "this is junk" header list that probably has to have wildcards in it.