Re: mysterious c0 80

Ralph wrote: > nmh shouldn't comp(1) a new email today with a NUL in the body, but it > should be able to read and show(1) one. I'm thinking of removing the support in post(8) for sending NULs. Any disagreement? It's not a lot of code so could be easily restored in the future if conditions

Re: mysterious c0 80

Hi Ken, > According to RFC 5322, a NUL in a message body is not permitted. > From §3.5: > >body= (*(*998text CRLF) *998text) / obs-body > >text= %d1-9 /; Characters excluding CR >%d11 / ; and LF >