Re: folders which are numerical names

2024-06-24 Thread George Michaelson
I'm willing to bet if I look back in the prior 3 decades I'll find myself asking the same question and the infrequency of it bugging me, is a strong indication of how (un)important it is. maybe I'd move my marker and ask if it could become a "soft" error on scan: % ls -F | sort -n | tail -5; 586

Re: folders which are numerical names

2024-06-24 Thread Ken Hornstein
>if your folder is a primary directly under $MAILPATH/ it works fine, as a >pure numeric > >so folder +2021 is fine -and I do this for archives by year. > >if your folder is sub-folder under another folder like +sent/2021 it only >kind-of works. Any function which performs scan functions looks to p

folders which are numerical names

2024-06-24 Thread George Michaelson
if your folder is a primary directly under $MAILPATH/ it works fine, as a pure numeric so folder +2021 is fine -and I do this for archives by year. if your folder is sub-folder under another folder like +sent/2021 it only kind-of works. Any function which performs scan functions looks to pure num