I'm willing to bet if I look back in the prior 3 decades I'll find myself
asking the same question and the infrequency of it bugging me, is a strong
indication of how (un)important it is.
maybe I'd move my marker and ask if it could become a "soft" error on scan:
% ls -F | sort -n | tail -5;
586
>if your folder is a primary directly under $MAILPATH/ it works fine, as a
>pure numeric
>
>so folder +2021 is fine -and I do this for archives by year.
>
>if your folder is sub-folder under another folder like +sent/2021 it only
>kind-of works. Any function which performs scan functions looks to p
if your folder is a primary directly under $MAILPATH/ it works fine, as a
pure numeric
so folder +2021 is fine -and I do this for archives by year.
if your folder is sub-folder under another folder like +sent/2021 it only
kind-of works. Any function which performs scan functions looks to pure
num