Re: folders which are numerical names

2024-06-25 Thread Ken Hornstein
>I'm willing to bet if I look back in the prior 3 decades I'll find myself >asking the same question and the infrequency of it bugging me, is a strong >indication of how (un)important it is. > >maybe I'd move my marker and ask if it could become a "soft" error on scan: > >% ls -F | sort -n | tail -

Re: folders which are numerical names

2024-06-25 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi George, > So I work around it by having archives like sent/y2021 and it works > fine. I have sequences for years within a folder, e.g. y98, and y24. They have to have a prefix to avoid clashing with message numbers as sequences don't have a sigil whereas folders have ‘+’ or ‘@’. But even if