Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-17 Thread Chad Walstrom
Bill Wohler wrote: > If you're already using Emacs, MH-E is a clear winner :-). I adore MH-E! I tried Wanderlust recently, due to its ability to interact with IMAP accounts. I gave up on it due to slowness and awkward keystroke assignment. There are things that do work a little better in Wanderl

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-17 Thread Tethys
otah...@gmx.ca writes: >Could you please give a brief assesment of each, based on your experience? It's been so many years since I last used xmh that I doubt I could give an accurate assessment of it. But like you say, it's obsolete nowadays anyway. I use exmh as my main front end. It's buggy,

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-17 Thread Bill Wohler
otah...@gmx.ca writes: > First of all, thanks to all of you guys on this mailing list. I am > learning a lot. > I hope you will excuse my many questions. > > I was happy to find out, from Ken's last email, that there is yet > another front-end for nmh whose existence I did not know of: MH-V by > S

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Peter Davis
I don't want to draw this out, but mutt is *so* much faster than any other front end that anyone who wants to get through a large volume of mail quickly really should check it out. It may be that there are some potential conflicts with other MH programs, as Ken says, but it's possibly to make ri

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
Which one would be the best bet for a newbie? We don't know your work flow. We don't know what features are important to you. We don't know anything that could help us intelligently answer the question. I suggest you just install the various front ends, run each for a while, and decide fo

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread chad
On 13 Feb 2014, at 19:11, Ken Hornstein wrote: >> 1) xmh (obsolete, I assume) > > I would be shocked if people still use xmh; wasn't it written with > Athena Widgets? Eww. Yeah, it was written in Xaw, but it was also written before Microsoft Windows came with network support included, so I th

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread otahler
On 2014-02-14 15:37, Michael Richardson wrote: I can even run it (emacs+MHE) on my tablet (yes, it has a keyboard) with a debian chroot installed 20 hour of battery life, it is nice. This is slightly off topic, I know, but what tablet has a 20 hr batter life? I have never heard of tablets

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Claire M. Connelly
"o" == otahler o> The ones I came across so far (though I have not ried them o> yet) are: 1) xmh (obsolete, I assume) 2) MH-E 3) exmh 4) o> MH-V I started by using the command-line tools back in... 1990?* with Emacs as my editor.** Later I spent some years using exmh, until it seem

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Michael Richardson
Ken Hornstein wrote: > Unfortunately, all of the front-ends (and IMAP servers) that claim to > support MH mailboxes with their own implementation of the code only do > it half-assed. People make it work, but you have to be aware of the > limitations. For me, I want it just for a

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Ken Hornstein
>I'm not sure how this would be an issue, unless you had multiple >processes accessing the file at once, which is never the case for >me. (I don't have any cron jobs fetching email. I simply fetch it when >I want to read it.) A number of people have fetchmail retrieving email, or procmail feeding

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Paul Fox
otah...@gmx.ca wrote: > First of all, thanks to all of you guys on this mailing list. I am > learning a lot. > I hope you will excuse my many questions. > > I was happy to find out, from Ken's last email, that there is yet > another front-end for nmh whose existence I did not know of: MH-V

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Peter Davis
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:08:46AM -0500, Ken Hornstein wrote: > >I really think you might want to consider mutt. It's not MH-specific (it > >also supports maildir, mbox, IMAP and probably a few others), but it > >certainly provides an excellent and highly customizable front-end for an MH > >mail r

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Ken Hornstein
>I really think you might want to consider mutt. It's not MH-specific (it >also supports maildir, mbox, IMAP and probably a few others), but it >certainly provides an excellent and highly customizable front-end for an MH >mail repository. A word of caution: mutt has the same problem that Claws Mai

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Michael Richardson
exmh was the gateway drug that got me into (n)mh usage in the 1990s. Once I realized that I wanted to compose in emacs, I switched slowly to MH-E. (That transition was 15 years ago). I also helped that my first laptop had too little ram to run X-widnows, but could run emacs in console mode (or

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-13 Thread Peter Davis
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:26 PM, wrote: > > The ones I came across so far (though I have not ried them yet) are: > 1) xmh (obsolete, I assume) > 2) MH-E > 3) exmh > 4) MH-V > > I really think you might want to consider mutt. It's not MH-specific (it also supports maildir, mbox, IMAP and probably

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-13 Thread Ken Hornstein
>1) xmh (obsolete, I assume) I would be shocked if people still use xmh; wasn't it written with Athena Widgets? Eww. >2) MH-E There is a relatively active MH-E community; I'm a vi user myself, so I never tried it. From what I can tell they've extended it to make up for the deficiencies in MH;

[Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-13 Thread otahler
First of all, thanks to all of you guys on this mailing list. I am learning a lot. I hope you will excuse my many questions. I was happy to find out, from Ken's last email, that there is yet another front-end for nmh whose existence I did not know of: MH-V by Steve Rader. I have just downloade