Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about RFC 2822: "A.1.3. Group addresses".

2017-10-15 Thread Ken Hornstein
>I think nmh needs to allow these to be sent. As >http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2013-12/msg00024.html >covered, now we've a DCC, IOW a proper BCC, the addresses don't need to >be stripped to provide a `To: Undisclosed-recipients: ;'. Though it >would need `I know the modern

Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about RFC 2822: "A.1.3. Group addresses".

2017-10-15 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi, Tom Rodman wrote off-list that he submitted an email to `sendmail -t -oi -oem' with a To that was a group address with a single email address and it made it to the destination unharmed. So I typed SMTP to the local Postfix, giving it a To with two addresses in a group, and a CC with one.

Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about RFC 2822: "A.1.3. Group addresses".

2017-10-12 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Tom, > I wanted for example a header like this as seen by a recipient: > > To: Membership Committee: pers...@foobar.com, pers...@baz.org ; > > to make it clear pers...@foobar.com, and pers...@baz.org are both in > the "Membership Committee". Yep, I've wanted that too in the past.

Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about RFC 2822: "A.1.3. Group addresses".

2017-10-10 Thread David Levine
Ken wrote: > Fair enough. I suspect that maybe this was the original intent, but > whatever people intended as the original idea behind group address lists > seem to have fallen by the wayside. Nowadays you only really see them > "in the wild" to obscure email recipients. Yeah, RFC 5322 ยง3.4

Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about RFC 2822: "A.1.3. Group addresses".

2017-10-10 Thread Ken Hornstein
>I know it's a bit silly, but I wanted >for example a header like this as seen by a recipient: > >To: Membership Committee: pers...@foobar.com, pers...@baz.org ; > >to make it clear pers...@foobar.com, and pers...@baz.org are both in the >"Membership Committee". Fair enough. I suspect that

Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about RFC 2822: "A.1.3. Group addresses".

2017-10-10 Thread nmh
Hi Ken: On Tue 10/10/17 16:28 -0400 Ken Hornstein wrote: > >For clarity, > >I decided to use a "mail group", for example "My Group" as in this 3 line > >body less test draft: > > > >From: my_from_alias_here > >To: My Group: f...@notreal.nil ; >

Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about RFC 2822: "A.1.3. Group addresses".

2017-10-10 Thread valdis . kletnieks
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 16:28:59 -0400, Ken Hornstein said: > I have never really understood what the purpose of the group syntax is; > I mean, yeah, I've read the RFCs about them, but they deal in kinda vague > high-level concepts; I don't really understand how to translate those > words into actual

Re: [Nmh-workers] Question about RFC 2822: "A.1.3. Group addresses".

2017-10-10 Thread Ken Hornstein
>For clarity, >I decided to use a "mail group", for example "My Group" as in this 3 line >body less test draft: > >From: my_from_alias_here >To: My Group: f...@notreal.nil ; > >Fcc: sent >

[Nmh-workers] Question about RFC 2822: "A.1.3. Group addresses".

2017-10-10 Thread nmh
For clarity, I decided to use a "mail group", for example "My Group" as in this 3 line body less test draft: From: my_from_alias_here To: My Group: f...@notreal.nil ; Fcc: sent Of course