Jerry Peek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22 December 2005 at 14:57, Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Which gives me another idea for nmh from MH-E: create a width format
> > that uses the widest value in the range given to it.
>
> I'm not clear what you mean by "the range given to it"
Comment #1:
On 22 December 2005 at 14:57, Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which gives me another idea for nmh from MH-E: create a width format
> that uses the widest value in the range given to it.
I'm not clear what you mean by "the range given to it", Bill.
But your point gave me a re
Michael Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I want to use it to fill in various fields (From:, FCC: for instance),
> based upon patterns in the To:, CC: and maybe even In-Reply-To:.
> It uses to work, then it broke. Now I use the "Identity" bar in MH-E,
> but that's not MH --- that's emac
Paul Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and usually it's
> just to overcome some failing of the default formats, like the
> first time my message numbers went over .
MH-E adapts the scan format dynamically you you don't have to.
Which gives me anoth
