Jon Steinhart wrote:
>Also, I have time to roll another release now. Is it time? I know
>that it was a while back, but have all of the recent check-ins been
>tested enough for everybody?
Are we going to try to maintain a 'stable branch' or are we just going
to tag the head of CVS every so often
>I just did a 'cvs update', and the resulting tree was lacking a config.h.in
>which the configure script wanted:
That's created by autoconf (well, autoheader, actually). It's not in CVS
for the same reason that configure is not; it's automatically generated.
Just run autoheader and you'll be fine
Oliver Kiddle wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Are we going to try to maintain a 'stable branch' or are we just going
>> to tag the head of CVS every so often and hope it's not too buggy?
>
>I thought we had a RELEASE_1_2 branch in CVS like the RELEASE_1_1 branch
>but, checking now, it seems tha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Are we going to try to maintain a 'stable branch' or are we just going
> to tag the head of CVS every so often and hope it's not too buggy?
I thought we had a RELEASE_1_2 branch in CVS like the RELEASE_1_1 branch
but, checking now, it seems that's a tag. Other tags ha
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:44:39 EST, David Levine said:
> See docs/README.developers: you need to run autoheader and
> autoconf.
Damn. Ran autoconf, forgot autoheader.
Somebody pass me some caffeine. ;)
pgp9VFUFEqfKf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I just did a 'cvs update', and the resulting tree was lacking a config.h.in
> which the configure script wanted:
Try running autoheader and autoconf first. config.h.in is a generated
file.
Oliver
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
> I just did a 'cvs update', and the resulting tree was lacking a config.h.in
> which the configure script wanted:
>
> configure: creating ./config.status
> config.status: creating Makefile
> config.status: creating config/Makefile
> config.status: creating h/Makefile
> config.status: creating sbr
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:01:45 PST, Jon Steinhart said:
> Also, I have time to roll another release now. Is it time? I know
> that it was a while back, but have all of the recent check-ins been
> tested enough for everybody?
I just did a 'cvs update', and the resulting tree was lacking a config.h
> Hi everybody. I've noticed a huge increase in the amount of
> spam coming from the nmh-commits mailing list. Any chance that
> one of you who has started checking stuff in recently is using
> a Microsoft machine? If so, please check it for viruses and
> stuff. I'm gonna have to unsubscribe if
Hi everybody. I've noticed a huge increase in the amount of
spam coming from the nmh-commits mailing list. Any chance that
one of you who has started checking stuff in recently is using
a Microsoft machine? If so, please check it for viruses and
stuff. I'm gonna have to unsubscribe if it keeps
10 matches
Mail list logo
