Re: [Nmh-workers] Third release candidate for nmh 1.6 now available

2014-06-12 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Lyndon, I agree with David's comments about Heirloom shell and posh. > Just redirect stdout to /dev/null and you can avoid using either of -s > or -q. In most cases. Sometimes it's used to wait until a match is seen on an infinite stream and then quit. As if `sed /foo/q'. ;-) Cheers, Ralp

Re: [Nmh-workers] Third release candidate for nmh 1.6 now available

2014-06-12 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:12:26 +0100, Ralph Corderoy writes: >Hi Alexander, > >> e.g. all manpages to go in as whatever.1mh instead of whatever.1 > >OOI, why's that? And is that a recentish change on Debian as this old >Ubuntu doesn't do that. Does that mean co(1) is co.1rcs, etc. too? it's requir

Re: [Nmh-workers] Third release candidate for nmh 1.6 now available

2014-06-11 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
On Jun 11, 2014, at 3:54 PM, David Levine wrote: > Pretty much. I test with heirloom sh and posh. So the limits > are reasonably well defined and it's easy to detect attempts to > go outside them. Until we need more, I'd like to stick with them. Just redirect stdout to /dev/null and you can

Re: [Nmh-workers] Third release candidate for nmh 1.6 now available

2014-06-11 Thread David Levine
Ralph wrote: > Hi David, > > > ! isn't portable. Neither is egrep -q. > > What kind of portability are we aiming at? ! is in POSIX; > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_ > 18_09_02 > Similarly, `grep -Eq' is too; I should have typed "grep" instead of

Re: [Nmh-workers] Third release candidate for nmh 1.6 now available

2014-06-11 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi David, > > I am not sure about that shell syntax; someone else will have to confirm > > if it's portable enough. > > ! isn't portable. Neither is egrep -q. What kind of portability are we aiming at? ! is in POSIX; http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_

Re: [Nmh-workers] Third release candidate for nmh 1.6 now available

2014-06-11 Thread Paul Fox
david wrote: > Ken wrote: > > > I am not sure about that shell syntax; someone else will have to confirm > > if it's portable enough. > > ! isn't portable. Neither is egrep -q. huh. shows what i know. :-) paul =-- paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma,

Re: [Nmh-workers] Third release candidate for nmh 1.6 now available

2014-06-11 Thread Paul Fox
ken wrote: > >1. the automatic debian build daemons and build environments are very > >stripped down, without guarantees wrt. particular locales being configured. > > > >it makes no sense to attempt the tests that only work if en_US.UTF-8 is > >available, so i've made the affected tests check

Re: [Nmh-workers] Third release candidate for nmh 1.6 now available

2014-06-11 Thread David Levine
Ken wrote: > I am not sure about that shell syntax; someone else will have to confirm > if it's portable enough. ! isn't portable. Neither is egrep -q. David ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [Nmh-workers] Third release candidate for nmh 1.6 now available

2014-06-11 Thread Ken Hornstein
>1. the automatic debian build daemons and build environments are very >stripped down, without guarantees wrt. particular locales being configured. > >it makes no sense to attempt the tests that only work if en_US.UTF-8 is >available, so i've made the affected tests check that and skip if >necessar

Re: [Nmh-workers] Third release candidate for nmh 1.6 now available

2014-06-11 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Alexander, > e.g. all manpages to go in as whatever.1mh instead of whatever.1 OOI, why's that? And is that a recentish change on Debian as this old Ubuntu doesn't do that. Does that mean co(1) is co.1rcs, etc. too? Cheers, Ralph. ___ Nmh-workers

Re: [Nmh-workers] Third release candidate for nmh 1.6 now available

2014-06-11 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 10:08:12 -0400, Ken Hornstein writes: >I am hoping that this release will be good enough to be the basis of >the 1.6 final release, so I would encourage everyone to download it >and try it out. i've just packaged and uploaded the debian build of this version, and things look pr

Re: [Nmh-workers] Third release candidate for nmh 1.6 now available

2014-06-09 Thread norm
Ken Hornstein writes: > >Ken Hornstein >on behalf of the nmh development team Thank you very much, Norman Shapiro on behalf of nmh users, everywhere. ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-

[Nmh-workers] Third release candidate for nmh 1.6 now available

2014-06-08 Thread Ken Hornstein
Greetings all, I am pleased to announce that the third release candidate for nmh 1.6 is now available. You can download it here: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/nmh/nmh-1.6-RC3.tar.gz (I've also included a MIME exteral-body pointer to it below, which newer versions of nmh should b