Re: [Nmh-workers] flattening continuation lines

2005-04-19 Thread Oliver Kiddle
Paul Fox wrote: in general, i agree, and it was my first reaction, after seeing that content-disposition has been on the mh todo list for a number of years. in this particular case, the changes aren't for me -- they're for my wife, to use at work, where she's been burned in the past by

Re: [Nmh-workers] flattening continuation lines

2005-04-18 Thread Oliver Kiddle
Paul Fox wrote: i have what feels like a simple problem. i want to post-process the output of mhbuild to add a Content-disposition header after any Content-type header that matches some criteria. Wouldn't it be easier to just edit the C code? Out of interest, why do you want to do this? Are

[Nmh-workers] flattening continuation lines

2005-04-17 Thread Paul Fox
i have what feels like a simple problem. i want to post-process the output of mhbuild to add a Content-disposition header after any Content-type header that matches some criteria. i have this pretty much working, with the following: #!/bin/sh # add a Content-disposition field for every