Re: [Nmh-workers] test-slocal

2013-04-18 Thread Paul Fox
david wrote: Paul F. wrote: so it looks to me like this command: /home/pgf/src/pdom/nmh/nmh.git/test/testdir/inst/usr/local/nmh.git/lib/sl ocal -maildelivery /home/pgf/src/pdom/nmh/nmh.git/test/testdir/Mail/maildeliv ery should have produced the .actual file, but

Re: [Nmh-workers] test-slocal

2013-04-18 Thread David Levine
Paul wrote: WARNING: /home/pgf/src/pdom/nmh/nmh.git/test/testdir/Mail/maildelivery has bad ownership/modes (su=0,uid=1000,owner=1000,mode=0100664) (delivering to standard mail spool) So you have a umask of 0002? I'll add this to the test, that should fix it: @@ -78,0 +79 @@ EOF +chmod go-w

Re: [Nmh-workers] test-slocal

2013-04-18 Thread Paul Fox
david wrote: Paul wrote: WARNING: /home/pgf/src/pdom/nmh/nmh.git/test/testdir/Mail/maildelivery has bad ownership/modes (su=0,uid=1000,owner=1000,mode=0100664) (delivering to standard mail spool) So you have a umask of 0002? yes. I'll add this to the test, that should fix

Re: [Nmh-workers] test-slocal

2013-04-18 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
On 2013-04-18, at 8:16 AM, David Levine wrote: So you have a umask of 0002? I'll add this to the test, that should fix it: Why not set an explicit umask instead? ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org

Re: [Nmh-workers] test-slocal

2013-04-18 Thread David Levine
Lyndon wrote: On 2013-04-18, at 8:16 AM, David Levine wrote: So you have a umask of 0002? I'll add this to the test, that should fix it: Why not set an explicit umask instead? I prefer that the test suite not hide other situations where it also might matter. Though in this case, I