On Thu, 08 Nov 2018 17:53:28 +, Ralph Corderoy writes:
>Reading through the notes, it appears metamail is pretty vital for
>display of MIME messages.
it's not required anymore; i added support for recode instead
of metamail in commit 2bf11b0704 in 2008.
regards
az
--
Alexander Zangerl + GP
Hi,
> Thanks, I now have
>
> $ b2sum exmh-2.9.0.tar.gz | cut -c-42
> a097b2e5c5cd44dd6d84e239bf6e674584e9eb4952
Reading through the notes, it appears metamail is pretty vital for
display of MIME messages. (In particular, I was interested to see how
exmh handled text/html.) metamail isn'
On 08 Nov 2018 08:16:55 -0700, "Andy Bradford" said:
> If you didn't see my previous email... It was already done long ago by
> MARC; these archives go back to 1998:
>
> https://marc.info/?l=exmh-users&r=1&w=2
> https://marc.info/?l=exmh-workers&r=1&w=2
>
> I don't know if they are 100% comp
Thus said Ralph Corderoy on Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:36:12 +:
> A workaround is to subscribe the list to a public archiver so Google
> can see everything from the switch-over date onwards, as long as the
> list-info page makes this clear as otherwise new posters still think
> it's semi-privat
Thus said Ken Hornstein on Wed, 07 Nov 2018 15:52:32 -0500:
> >I considered poking around
> >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users for signs of life,
> >but those archives are subscriber only.
>
> You know, this has always driven me nuts. Why is it set like this? Can
> that be open
Hi Ken,
> Even being on the list ... it's a pain. Because to access the list
> archives I have to remember my "list password"
Because there's so little value in the Mailman subscription password, I
let Firefox remember them.
> I mean, I don't get it ... why not make them public? I'm on a numbe
>of course, once one is on the right list, then one has access to
>the archives, making the whole conversation, in the eyes of those
>defending the policy, moot. hard to have a rational conversation
>about the issue in that context.
Even being on the list ... it's a pain. Because to access the l
tom wrote:
> Ken Hornstein writes:
> > I am subscribed, but occasionally I want to look at the archives. I am
> > not a member of any other list that is restricted to subscribers only.
> > Are you actually arguing this makes sense?
>
> FWIW, I am on quite a few other lists that restrict th
Ken Hornstein writes:
> I am subscribed, but occasionally I want to look at the archives. I am
> not a member of any other list that is restricted to subscribers only.
> Are you actually arguing this makes sense?
FWIW, I am on quite a few other lists that restrict their archives
to subscribers.
>> You know, this has always driven me nuts. Why is it set like this? Can
>> that be opened up?
>You could always subscribe.
I am subscribed, but occasionally I want to look at the archives. I am
not a member of any other list that is restricted to subscribers only.
Are you actually arguing thi
Den 07.11.2018 21:52, skrev Ken Hornstein:
I considered poking around
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users for signs of life,
but those archives are subscriber only.
You know, this has always driven me nuts. Why is it set like this? Can
that be opened up?
You could always subsc
>I considered poking around
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users for signs of life,
>but those archives are subscriber only.
You know, this has always driven me nuts. Why is it set like this? Can
that be opened up?
--Ken
--
nmh-workers
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
Hi valdis,
> I'm tagging the current git tree as 2.9.0 and pushing out the tarballs
Thanks, I now have
$ b2sum exmh-2.9.0.tar.gz | cut -c-42
a097b2e5c5cd44dd6d84e239bf6e674584e9eb4952
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
--
nmh-workers
https://lists.nongnu.org/mai
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 08:21:46 +1000, Alexander Zangerl said:
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 14:02:48 +, Ralph Corderoy writes:
> >Where does one go for exmh these days? Google's top hit is
> >http://exmh.sourceforge.net/
>
> and that's the right place for uptodate sources.
It needs some work though.
On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 14:02:48 +, Ralph Corderoy writes:
>Where does one go for exmh these days? Google's top hit is
>http://exmh.sourceforge.net/
and that's the right place for uptodate sources.
>and that says the current web site is
>http://www.beedub.com/exmh/.
i'll get in touch with brent
Hi Tom,
> The last I heard on the topic was per attached.
Ah, thanks. I see 2.8.0 at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/exmh/files/exmh/
> valdis wrote:
> > Finally beat 'git cvsimport' into submission
That reminds me of Eric Raymond's reposurgeon that Bill Wohler used for
coverting the mh-e rep
Ralph Corderoy writes:
> Where does one go for exmh these days?
The last I heard on the topic was per attached. It doesn't look like
there has been any activity in the sourceforge git tree since then, which
seems odd. Anyway, the exmh-users list is definitely still active;
I got some traffic fr
Hi,
Where does one go for exmh these days? Google's top hit is
http://exmh.sourceforge.net/ and that says the current web site is
http://www.beedub.com/exmh/. There, `2.7.2 released January 7, 2004'
headlines and the tar file is beside it.
But Debian ships 2.8.0 on its stable version and in
htt
18 matches
Mail list logo
