Ken wrote:
> I am thinking maybe we should change the nmh default mhl files as well
> to recognize current reality
+1 to removing "extras:nocomponent".
David
[2023-04-02 14:04] Michael Richardson
> I use MH-E, which does it's header display/hiding outside of MH.
> In general, I like to see extra headers, but they have gotten way out of hand
> from the MS/Outlook space.
> We probably need a better list of common "this is junk" header list that
>
Date:Sun, 02 Apr 2023 11:44:23 -0700
From:Jon Steinhart
Message-ID: <202304021844.332iin922005...@darkstar.fourwinds.com>
| It does seem like the size of the headers exceeds the size of the body
| in a lot of cases :-)
Like in this message from you ... even
>It does seem like the size of the headers exceeds the size of the body
>in a lot of cases :-)
I mean ... yes? Doesn't seem like there's much we can do about that
unfortunately.
--Ken
Ken Hornstein writes:
> >I use MH-E, which does it's header display/hiding outside of MH. In
> >general, I like to see extra headers, but they have gotten way out of
> >hand from the MS/Outlook space. We probably need a better list of
> >common "this is junk" header list that probably has to
>I use MH-E, which does it's header display/hiding outside of MH. In
>general, I like to see extra headers, but they have gotten way out of
>hand from the MS/Outlook space. We probably need a better list of
>common "this is junk" header list that probably has to have wildcards in
>it.
Sigh. I
I use MH-E, which does it's header display/hiding outside of MH.
In general, I like to see extra headers, but they have gotten way out of hand
from the MS/Outlook space.
We probably need a better list of common "this is junk" header list that
probably
has to have wildcards in it.
>Thanks Ken. So my mhl.headers looks like this:
>[...]
I am wondering if you are, in fact, not using that mhl.headers file like
David just suggested? It sure looks like you are not. It almost seems
like your showproc is just "more".
--Ken
Jon wrote:
> Things are way more verbose in the current release in that all sorts
> of headers clog up my display.
There's this, but that should just add a few headers:
commit 5579e0dd84f9dcb67c989a191538346ee7ab63e2
Author: David Levine
Date: Sun Jul 14 09:29:21 2019 -0400
show and mhl
Ken Hornstein writes:
> >Hey all, been meaning to get to this for a while.
> >
> >Things are way more verbose in the current release in that all sorts
> >of headers clog up my display. The extras:nocomponent only seems to
> >cut down on a few components.
>
> Well, I know this is confusing,
>Hey all, been meaning to get to this for a while.
>
>Things are way more verbose in the current release in that all sorts
>of headers clog up my display. The extras:nocomponent only seems to
>cut down on a few components.
Well, I know this is confusing, bttt ... "extras:nocomponent" means
Hey all, been meaning to get to this for a while.
Things are way more verbose in the current release in that all sorts
of headers clog up my display. The extras:nocomponent only seems to
cut down on a few components.
Am I doing something wrong, did something deliberately change, or is
there
12 matches
Mail list logo
