Re: [NMusers] RE: Link different thetas to same omega using mu referencing

2016-04-13 Thread Emmanuel Chigutsa
Hi Jacob, Yes, THETA(4) would represent the typical value (before exponentiation). In summary, writing your covariate code after the definition of MU should circumvent the time-varying problem. If you want everything on a log scale you could try:OCL=MU_1+ETA(1)CL=EXP(OCL+CLCOV) The issue with tr

Re: [NMusers] RE: Link different thetas to same omega using mu referencing

2016-04-13 Thread Emmanuel Chigutsa
I think the following code should work: IF(CAT.EQ.1) CLCOV = THETA(1)IF(CAT.EQ.2) CLCOV = THETA(2)IF(CAT.EQ.3) CLCOV = THETA(3)MU_1 = THETA(4) CL = EXP(MU_1+ETA(1))*(1+CLCOV) $OMEGA BLOCK(1) 0.1 Mannie From: Rupert Austin To: "'Sadler, Brian'" ; nmusers@globomaxnm.com Sent: Wednesday,

RE: [NMusers] RE: Link different thetas to same omega using mu referencing

2016-04-13 Thread Bob Leary
Rupert, I believe at least in principle you are right (I am not sure of the specifics for NONMEM but I am generally familiar with the implementation challenges that time varying covariates pose for EM methods. ) The basic problem is that mu-modeling works to speed up EM methods because the EM u

RE: [NMusers] RE: Link different thetas to same omega using mu referencing

2016-04-13 Thread Rupert Austin
I’m not sure that Brian’s suggestion is acceptable due to the following constraint I quote from one of the NONMEM manuals: “Time dependent covariates cannot be part of the MU_ equation” If CAT is time-varying (as suggested by Jacob) then “MU_1 = CAT1*THETA(1) + CAT2*THETA(2) + CAT3*THETA(

[NMusers] RE: Link different thetas to same omega using mu referencing

2016-04-13 Thread Sadler, Brian
Hi Jacob, I suggest: CAT1=0 CAT2=0 CAT3=0 IF(CAT.EQ.1) CAT1=1 IF(CAT.EQ.2) CAT2=1 IF(CAT.EQ.3) CAT3=1 MU_1 = CAT1*THETA(1) + CAT2*THETA(2) + CAT3*THETA(3) CL = EXP(MU_1+ETA(1)) That way you have only one OMEGA. This could be more flexible when expanding OMEGA for additional IIV in block format.

[NMusers] RE: Link different thetas to same omega using mu referencing

2016-04-13 Thread Michael Fossler
This looks like it would work - it seems to obey the rules around mu-referencing. You can simplify the $OMEGA by using SAME(3) Mike Michael J. Fossler, Pharm. D., Ph. D., F.C.P. VP, Quantitative Sciences Trevena, Inc mfoss...@trevenainc.com Office: 610-354-8840, e

[NMusers] Link different thetas to same omega using mu referencing

2016-04-13 Thread Leander, Jacob
Hi Consider the case where we have a categorical (potentially time-varying) covariate named CAT that can take several values (e.g. 0,1,2,3). Let's say I want to model CL depending on this categorical covariate (where parameters are estimated on log-scale). A simple solution to this would be IF(

[NMusers] WCoP 2016 Registration and Final Call for Abstracts

2016-04-13 Thread Nick Holford
*Submission of poster abstracts is closing soon* We encourage you to contribute your research, knowledge and experience by submitting an abstract for consideration as a poster presentation at the conference. *Poster presentations* – posters will be on display for the duration of the confere