Re: [NMusers] Clarification on performance of mu referencing

Hi Sébastien, My understanding is that keeping all thetas additive makes mu r referencing more efficient. The underlying mu reference math is then accurate for matrix linear formulations. My understanding is not perfect for this, so I'll defer to others if there is a different answer. Thanks,

[NMusers] Clarification on performance of mu referencing

Hi Training material distributed during an ICON training contains the following verbatim statements about mu referencing " Code already defined as Typical Value (TV), actual value (as recommended by Beal) are easy to convert: – TVCL = THETA(1)*AGE**THETA(2) – MU_5 = LOG(TVCL) – CL = EXP(MU_5+ET