hi, I found a pc(window, can be remote control from public) which can
connect to the linux server.
could you plz send me an private email? (atian25 # qq.com)
在 2012年8月21日星期二UTC+8上午12时10分39秒，Ben Noordhuis写道：
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:06 PM, TZ (天猪) >
> wrote:
> > sadly, should I give up?
I mean setInterval, inside a socket.on('connect')
On Aug 20, 10:18 pm, Filipe wrote:
> If there's the need to update user points every one second (server
> side and client side), will be a wise idea to use a setTimeout with an
> anonymous function to update DB and emit new point to client side?
If there's the need to update user points every one second (server
side and client side), will be a wise idea to use a setTimeout with an
anonymous function to update DB and emit new point to client side?
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wi
What about socket.io .on('connect'), .on('disconnect').
You can get the time range user is logged, and then sum up these in db.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Filipe wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I have this scenario: Express, Socket.io and MongoDB.
>
> The problem: reward points to the user on ho
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:19 PM, sihorton wrote:
> This looks like a great project.
>
> I have downloaded the nw_release_win32 and then I have downloaded a zip of
> https://github.com/zcbenz/nw-file-explorer and extracted to a subdirectory
> called "file-explorer" under nw_release_win32. I then
Why not update their count in the db once a minute? If you want, the code
would be simpler to sample all of them once a minute. It wouldn't be as
accurate but it would work well.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Filipe wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I have this scenario: Express, Socket.io and Mong
Hi everyone!
I have this scenario: Express, Socket.io and MongoDB.
The problem: reward points to the user on how many seconds (or time in
general) he keeps logged in (with the Socket opened).
This is for a chat site I'm building and I want to build a ranking
based on how many minutes users stay
Yeah, I couldn't agree with Dan more. Consistency is super important,
especially for a core lib. I mean, it could be worse, b ut, it should be
addressed rather than ignored.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Dan Milon wrote:
> Thats what PHP thought about deprecation also. See where this got them
Because we spend a lot of time convincing library authors not to defect from
the standard callback signature. Diverging from it in core sends the wrong
message.
On Aug 20, 2012, at August 20, 20128:59 AM, Arnout Kazemier
wrote:
> I really dont get why people want to depricate functions just b
Thats what PHP thought about deprecation also. See where this got them.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Arnout Kazemier wrote:
> I really dont get why people want to depricate functions just because they
> dont agree with the api signature.
>
> This is a useful function, it doesnt hurt anyone i
Fairly simple library ( http://www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst/packages/ ). I
never tried porting to gyp before but it can't hurt to try.
On Monday, August 20, 2012 4:22:33 PM UTC-4, Nathan Rajlich wrote:
>
> What is the external library / addon in question?
>
> If the library is simple enough, the
What is the external library / addon in question?
If the library is simple enough, the best way is to write a .gyp file
for it and do it the "gyp way". I would highly encourage you to
attempt to do that. An example of this is node-sqlite3's sqlite3.gyp
file:
https://github.com/developmentseed/nod
I'm building a native-addon and I'm using an external dependency that when
compiles outputs an object file (.o). I want my project to compile, then
compile the external dependency (via makefile not gyp) and then link the
resulting objects together to create my addon.
Is there a way to do that?
On Friday, August 17, 2012 9:00:49 PM UTC+2, adrians wrote:
>
>
> With node 0.8.7 x64 (Windows 7), npm seems to not see global modules
> installed under userdir/npm/... It only seems to look at the node_modules
> dir inside the install location. As well, when trying to install modules
> with -g,
Here are some relevant npm github issues for reference:
https://github.com/isaacs/npm/issues/1341
https://github.com/isaacs/npm/issues/2442
https://github.com/isaacs/npm/issues/1558
Cheers,
Adam
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Adam Crabtree wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> We're currently determining
Howdy all,
We're currently determining our post-git-merge npm install process, and I
was just curious if anyone's come up with anything particularly elegant
that's worked well for them. Our project is a multiprocess server, with
each process having it's own self-contained dependencies in addition
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:06 PM, TZ (天猪) wrote:
> sadly, should I give up?
If you can somehow get a ssh tunnel going, I'll be happy look at it.
But right now there's not much I can do.
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Po
sadly, should I give up?
在 2012年8月20日星期一UTC+8下午10时48分46秒，Ben Noordhuis写道：
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:30 PM, TZ (天猪) >
> wrote:
> > https://www.dropbox.com/s/vgcgatk917fovmb/core.7355
> > https://www.dropbox.com/s/9oa3li8inq6wzx2/node
>
> Thanks. I looked at it but couldn't find the culprit
I really dont get why people want to depricate functions just because they dont
agree with the api signature.
This is a useful function, it doesnt hurt anyone if we keep it, but it does
hurt when its removed.
On 20 aug. 2012, at 17:53, Tim Caswell wrote:
> How about removing it from the docs
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Navaneeth KN wrote:
>
> I was not talking about will it block the event loop or not. Because I am
> not using event loop at all explicitly. All I am doing is directly calling
> the C function in my module. I was wondering should I implement using Work
> queue (http
How about removing it from the docs and making it non-enumerable in
the fs module. Then any new developers won't know it's there unless
they are reading someone else's code. Or maybe in the docs simply say
that it shouldn't be used and is only left there so as to not break
old code. Also, how is
This looks like a great project.
I have downloaded the nw_release_win32 and then I have downloaded a zip of
https://github.com/zcbenz/nw-file-explorer and extracted to a subdirectory
called "file-explorer" under nw_release_win32. I then open a console and
run nw.exe file-explorer it opens a w
Thank you both!
I hadn't noticed client.write(str, callback), but when I test it I still
get the same result. And client.end('a') only writes once, then marks the
socket as not writable.
I figured out that the socket had a buffer. I wanted to understand a bit
more about why. And also the descript
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Navaneeth KN wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for responding.
>
> On Monday, 20 August 2012 17:37:55 UTC+5:30, Shripad K wrote:
>>
>> Hello Navaneeth,
>>
>> One cannot ascertain from the JS code whether the call is going to block
>> the event loop or not. In libev, you
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:30 PM, TZ (天猪) wrote:
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/vgcgatk917fovmb/core.7355
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/9oa3li8inq6wzx2/node
Thanks. I looked at it but couldn't find the culprit - there's a
uv_async_t handle that seems mostly uninitialized (most fields are 0
or NULL) for
Hello,
Thanks for responding.
On Monday, 20 August 2012 17:37:55 UTC+5:30, Shripad K wrote:
>
> Hello Navaneeth,
>
> One cannot ascertain from the JS code whether the call is going to block
> the event loop or not. In libev, you would register a ev_io watcher and
> listen for EV_READ, EV_WRITE
No. You have to read the data as a Buffer (binary) and use node-iconv to
convert it.
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Satit Rianpit wrote:
> Can I use tis620 or windows874 encoding for fs.readFile() in node.js
>
> Thanks.
>
> Satit Rianpit
>
> --
> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
> Posting gu
Hello Navaneeth,
One cannot ascertain from the JS code whether the call is going to block
the event loop or not. In libev, you would register a ev_io watcher and
listen for EV_READ, EV_WRITE (or both) events (ev_io_init() +
ev_io_start()) whenever the FD becomes readable/writable. I think the
equi
Hi Juan,
It's because the socket has a buffer and it's not flush everytime you write
on it.
If you want to send multiple message, you can use client.end('a'); instead
of client.write('a');
You don't need to write client.end(); because you socket is already
half-closed by the client.end('a');
Sounds like a nice small project to get the learning-fu going with node.
thanks,
Rob
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Hahn wrote:
> > we don't want to change it all the time because Nodejitsu or whatever
> web hoster deprecates support
>
> That is not likely to happen. I have code tha
Can I use tis620 or windows874 encoding for fs.readFile() in node.js
Thanks.
Satit Rianpit
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "
Hello,
I have a C shared library. I am writing a node module for this library. I
wrote a process function which can be accessed from JS and it calls my
shared library function. In JS, it looks like,
myLibrary.process(args, function(output) {
});
I am wondering, is this a non-blocking call or b
Hello, i need to make a monograph, and i go make about nodejs. You guys
know how i can or a idea about one system with nodejs for i make?
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message bec
Hi All,
I'm using sinon.js as a way to stub out dependencies in my Mocha tests. I
prefer the 'spy' approach over a classic mock approach, as the introspection of
the spy seems clearer and affords more flexibility than the somewhat
backward-thinking with classic mock objects.
That said, I wond
client.write writes to the kernel buffer, process next tick delays the
execution to the next event loop run. the event loop is faster than
client.write, so you write more data to the buffer, before it gets flushed.
try this:
var client = net.connect({port: 1337}, function () {
console.log('co
Hi,
nobody an idea?
Torben
Am Donnerstag, 16. August 2012 08:51:36 UTC+2 schrieb Honigbaum:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using express.js and the domain module of node.js for handling
> uncaught exception. I start every worker of the cluster in it's own domain.
> When an uncaught exception occurs I use
36 matches
Mail list logo
