connect to the same domain or send Access-Control-Allow-Origin headers.
read more here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/HTTP/Access_control_CORS
Am Dienstag, 19. März 2013 05:26:55 UTC+1 schrieb Bhushan N.N:
I am unable to get socket.io working on Chrome. I get the following error
Hi greelgorke,
Thanks for your response. I tried adding
res.header(Access-Control-Allow-Origin, *);
res.header(Access-Control-Allow-Headers, X-Requested-With);
using the blog post at
http://john.sh/blog/2011/6/30/cross-domain-ajax-expressjs-and-access-control-allow-origin.html
Still doesn't
On Monday, March 18, 2013 9:41:14 PM UTC+1, Nathan Rajlich wrote:
You have been very vocal indeed Bruno, I'm sorry that your proposal hasn't
gained more traction.
@Nathan
Less than 10 posts in 8 months. I've been rather quiet :-)
My proposal was exactly what you describe in your post (
I have a question regarding the new streams to which I could not find any
answer.
*Is it okay to use streams as before (aka old mode) ?*
On Monday, 18 March 2013 19:06:48 UTC+1, Sigurgeir Jonsson wrote:
The new streams have excellent support for high/low watermarks and
The real question being: will the pain of using it go away?
On Tuesday, 19 March 2013 10:12:38 UTC+1, Floby wrote:
I have a question regarding the new streams to which I could not find any
answer.
*Is it okay to use streams as before (aka old mode) ?*
On Monday, 18 March 2013 19:06:48
My advice is having your C++ library/process use a message-based
communication system.
- Using it from CLI means that you'll be most likely starting up a new
process each time you need it.
- Writing bindings to it can mean a lot of pain and headaches and also
constant maintenance
- using a
Floby,
It'll generally work just fine, but please consider using streams2 in the
new code.
Cheers,
Fedor.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Floby florent.j...@gmail.com wrote:
The real question being: will the pain of using it go away?
On Tuesday, 19 March 2013 10:12:38 UTC+1, Floby wrote:
Let me re-phrase my question.
I have server: http://blah.com. The server is just the repository of files.
Client has to fetch the files from http://blah.com/scripts folder. It's
simple http GET.
Every time I don't want to download the files. If the folder has new files
I should download only
var net = require('net');
var server = net.createServer(function (socket) {
socket.write('Echo server\r\n');
socket.pipe(socket);
});
server.listen(1337, '127.0.0.1');
there are two client connect the server port1337,
I need specify client to send data,how to do?
thank you for you help.
Be careful with this. If I'm reading your code correctly, you are relying
on the order of that object literal matching the order of the arguments
object. This is not guaranteed, as far as I know. This would cause your
arguments to be matched against the wrong schemas.
I'd suggest replacing the
I blogged about this a while ago, but ran out of time to do anything with it.
This blog post discusses the git HTTP protocol and what you need to do to be
able to push to/pull from a remote repository:
http://www.michaelfcollins3.me/blog/2012/05/18/implementing-a-git-http-server.html
I hope
You can save the sockets on a data structure to later be able to use them.
The most simple would be a simple array where you push the socket.
To a simple example look at :
https://gist.github.com/creationix/707146
Danilo.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:50 PM, fivew...@gmail.com wrote:
var net =
On Mar 19, 2013, at 07:29, vins wrote:
I have server: http://blah.com. The server is just the repository of files.
Client has to fetch the files from http://blah.com/scripts folder. It's
simple http GET.
Every time I don't want to download the files. If the folder has new files I
should
The message you replied to was two years old...
Have you tried with node 0.10 yet?
On Mar 18, 2013, at 04:22, Oleg Slobodskoi wrote:
I have this error reproducible very stable using node v0.8.21
And I think I have nailed the issue: it happens if the maxSockets of the
agent is lower than
The make install did not install them. There's no mention of them being
moved anywhere. node-gyp does not install them in any system directory, and
the node-gyp configure and install do not find them either (though, a `find
/` shows them in my home directory... ???). There are no notes on this
Danilo:
thanks you,is work!
在 2013年3月19日星期二UTC+8下午9时47分48秒，Danilo Luiz Rheinheimer Danilo写道：
You can save the sockets on a data structure to later be able to use them.
The most simple would be a simple array where you push the socket.
To a simple example look at :
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Nabeel S. nshah...@gmail.com wrote:
The make install did not install them. There's no mention of them being
moved anywhere. node-gyp does not install them in any system directory, and
the node-gyp configure and install do not find them either (though, a `find
Right, I've read through the release notes, and there's no mention of the
development headers being removed from the make install (and I don't
understand why)
I've been using node-gyp to build and compile. 0.8 installed the
development headers in the proper system paths. node-gyp is not doing
Hello fellow Node'rs,
I'm moving forward and getting close here with respect to my startup...
here's some background
- https://groups.google.com/d/topic/nodejs/77TqZeWiEZM/discussion
I have another question and can't find direct documentation although many
articles on similar topic...
I
Article + Screencast
http://blog.coolaj86.com/articles/how-and-why-auto-executing-function.html
AJ ONeal
--
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to
See also
http://benalman.com/news/2010/11/immediately-invoked-function-expression/
Not trying to rain on any parades, but Ben coined the term and his article
is comprehensive
Rick
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:07 PM, AJ ONeal coola...@gmail.com wrote:
Article + Screencast
Yeah, it's a good read.
I wouldn't say the one precludes the other. We're both explaining a thing,
but in the context of different other things (my focus is on the safety
benefits).
AJ ONeal
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.comwrote:
See also
I created a simple script to test cluster's performance sending messages to
workers.
My problem is it slows down the send() rate significantly as I add workers,
starting at 1 worker being the fastest. I would expect the send() rate to
be completely untied to the number of workers (at least until
Josh, sorry about the outdated documentation. The pipe method doesn't work
anymore. I've updated the README.
I still encourage you to try using streams (although I haven't had a chance
to update to streams2 yet).
The correct method would be:
feedparser.parseStream(request({ 'uri':
Hey Jatin,
Assuming I'm understanding your question:
1) Have an extra column in the DB (uniquely constrained, indexed) called
url_name or something and put chicago-the-musical in there when the
venue has registered.
2) Add a controller app.get(/events/:envent_name)
3) When someone hits
Thank you Phil.
On #2) so app.get(/events/:event_name) - here event_name is not url_name
so how does it ever route to proper URL? event_name is: Chicago, the
Musical and eventURL (named) would be chicago-the-musical.
#3) Sorry, can you explain this bit more? I don't understand.
Thanks,
Jatin
Jatin,
Here's the relevant documentation on expressjs.com:
http://expressjs.com/api.html#req.params
Cheers,
Phil
Jatin Patel jatin.je...@gmail.com writes:
Thank you Phil.
On #2) so app.get(/events/:event_name) - here event_name is not url_name
so how does it ever route to proper URL?
I have read below thread.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614907#113
the present pkg on ubuntu is old version. I wanted to have latest from
nodejs website, but I am not sure, if that will install in the manner
ubuntu wants it to be.
does anyone know?
ty.
--
--
Job Board:
Hi all,
My name is Phuc and I love Nodejs. I try to expand my knowledge and
technies in Nodejs but it's so hard to develop because of the lack of
materials and poor community in Vietnam. So I write this message to seek
the guide and help for the Nodejs community in Vietnam. May you share to me
Many people (including me) mooch off of Chris Lea's PPA for this purpose:
sudo add-apt-repository -y ppa:chris-lea/node.js
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install nodejs
He just upgraded to 0.10, but is maintaining a legacy PPA with 0.8, you can
read the details on his
Hi all, I have a problem where a system of mine that retries HTTP requests
when they fail is leaking memory. Here's a simple demo:
```
var http = require('http');
var request = function() {
var req = http.request({
host: 'localhost',
port: 9000,
method: 'GET',
path: '/'
});
I've been writing a bunch of shell-script-like node scripts lately. These
mostly call a series of async functions that take the usual function
(error, data) { ... } callback, and generally they handle any error along
the way by logging it and exiting. Here's a naive example using aws-sdk to
That doesn't leak when I run it on node 0.10 Changing the timeout to 1ms
so it goes quickly, it seems to very quickly hit a steady state of memory
usage (around 57mb in my case). It does rise the first few times, but
that's not a leak, that's how V8's JS heap works - it garbage collects
What's the difference from a someFunction(foo, xie(2, callbackFn))
pattern that doesn't pollute Function.prototype?
2013/3/20 Ken ken.woodr...@gmail.com:
I've been writing a bunch of shell-script-like node scripts lately. These
mostly call a series of async functions that take the usual
Felix says: don't do it.
http://nodeguide.com/style.html#extending-prototypes
...but it doesn't matter if you're programs are the only code that will
affected.
Rick
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013, George Stagas wrote:
What's the difference from a someFunction(foo, xie(2, callbackFn))
pattern
No need to (ab)use Function.prototype, just make xie a regular function:
var xie = function exitIfError(exitCode, f) {
// Same body as yours above
}
code collapses to just
ec2.runInstances({ ... }, xie(1, function (runInstancesResponse) {
// ... get the instanceIds from response as input to
Only terseness/consistency. It's easy for a module to add a bunch of stuff
to Function.prototype, and it's then just there with a consistent name.
For global functions to be available you'd have to require them, though
this gives you flexibility on the short names, e.g.
var xie =
Is there any good reason to ever use IIFE given that commonJS wraps my file
in a closure.
Can't every use-case for IIFE be replaced with write more smaller modules.
At least I havn't used them in months.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:44 AM, AJ ONeal coola...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, it's a good
This doesn't do too much to demystify anything, imo.
Now how that works... I have no idea, but I do believe that it's more
aesthetic and so that's how I write my code. I won't argue if you feel
differently.
It works because (foo)() is identical to foo().
The only reason that that even works
This doesn't do too much to demystify anything, imo.
Now how that works... I have no idea, but I do believe that it's more
aesthetic and so that's how I write my code. I won't argue if you feel
differently.
I suppose I should have been more specific:
This is an error foo():
function
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Jake Verbaten rayn...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any good reason to ever use IIFE given that commonJS wraps my
file in a closure.
Can't every use-case for IIFE be replaced with write more smaller modules.
At least I havn't used them in months.
Living the
Ah now we are getting someplace. Thanks for the information I will use it
when I build my server.
On Monday, March 18, 2013 10:18:20 PM UTC-4, mfcollins3 wrote:
I blogged about this a while ago, but ran out of time to do anything with
it. This blog post discusses the git HTTP protocol and
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:41 PM, AJ ONeal coola...@gmail.com wrote:
This doesn't do too much to demystify anything, imo.
Now how that works... I have no idea, but I do believe that it's more
aesthetic and so that's how I write my code. I won't argue if you feel
differently.
I suppose I
Can you 1. delete your ~/.node-gyp directory, and then 2. gist the output
of `npm install --verbose`?
Frankly, I've been getting a lot of strange error reports from people about
the node-gyp header installation process not working correctly on v0.10.0,
including myself :\ Hopefully I'll have some
Yeah, I'll admit that is sort of a hack. But it does works very reliably
from my experience. There will be problem if you have numeric keys but that
is not the case with arguments since you can't name arguments with numbers
anyway.
See here for more info:
Sure can, thanks. I haven't been able to find out why the headers were also
removed from the make install... that just seems like a strange decision to
me, esp since other projects do that. For now, I just copied the headers
manually into a local directory. Less than ideal, but need to get things
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Eric Muyser eric.muy...@gmail.com wrote:
I've done a lot of programming and this is definitely useful. I've come up
with a few times but never follow through with using it. The jQuery core
has a lot of argument type checking and should probably use something
47 matches
Mail list logo
