This may seems silly, but maybe you could try writing larger buffers. If
you write buffers of legnth 1, you'll cross the C++/JS border way more
often than if you write buffers of length, say 16 or 32.
I'm not sure it will improve things, but it seems it's worth a try.
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013
Hi, Floby, thanks for replying. I already tried that, sorry I didn't
mention it. Here is everything else I tried:
- Writing a large buffer. For some (yet) unknown reason,
process.binding('fs') fails with buffer larger than 8 octets. But trying to
write 8 byte buffers is worthless,
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 12:41:34 AM UTC-4, philip andrew wrote:
The reason why? I'm not programing a game, I'm programming a desktop
application. The reasons not particularly important from your point of view
expect to say that its a requirement to have NodeJS packaged with my
We implement Node.js in Windows Azure to act as a persistent websocket
endpoint (with Sock.js) for clients. Client messages from the websocket
channel are routed as regular HTTP requests to backend services, with
responses and other notifications going back up the same channel. After
about a year,
Hello
I try combine few streams in one and then parse its in separated streams
And now for me not clear how to pause of transform.
When i call method done (indicate stream continue transform) in Readable
stream - throw exception Error: no writecb in Transform class.
Thanks for help!
var fs =
Hi Everyone,
I started a blog about node js. It's a new site bit I am planning to
promote is trough different ways so many people will read it. I am looking
for guest authors, you can write about everything regarding node js. You
can link to your website, your social profiles etc, only
You may want to write this in C, but I'm not completely convinced yet.
- Writing a large buffer. For some (yet) unknown reason,
process.binding('fs') fails with buffer larger than 8 octets. But trying to
write 8 byte buffers is worthless, since only the first byte is taken into
I tried yesterday, and then again today, to post a message related to the
STLJS JavaScript Meetup in Saint Louis, Missouri, as I've done once every
month for the last two years.
Both times, the message appeared to be posted successfully, appeared at the
top of this group's message list and
Well this last message made it through, so I guess my email account isn't
blacklisted *per se*.
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 4:41:08 PM UTC-5, Michael Bradley, Jr. wrote:
I tried yesterday, and then again today, to post a message related to the
STLJS JavaScript Meetup in Saint Louis,
I have a node server app that I want to publish on npm. I would like it to
be easy for anyone to do an npm install and then run the server. I have
only published modules in npm, not apps. Some questions ...
1) After installing, how can they start the server? Of course they could
go to the app
I'm having one of those days. I have created some Grunt scripts to do some
build work. I have created the first script to do a JSHint check on JS
files in the repo, and then send an email with the errors. Works great -
I'm using grunt with jshint, and that module has an escape to call a custom
1. Use `npm start`. https://npmjs.org/doc/scripts.html
2. Sounds messy and fraught with issues. Not touching that. ;-)
Daniel Shaw
@dshaw
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Mark Hahn m...@hahnca.com wrote:
I have a node server app that I want to publish on npm. I would like it to
be easy for
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Mark Hahn m...@hahnca.com wrote:
2) My server only accepts https connections. I don't want them to have to
go to the trouble to install a self-signed certificate. Once again I'd
like for them to be able to do the npm install and then use it immediately
from
thanks - i didn't think of just running it from npm.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Dan Shaw ds...@dshaw.com wrote:
1. Use `npm start`. https://npmjs.org/doc/scripts.html
2. Sounds messy and fraught with issues. Not touching that. ;-)
Daniel Shaw
@dshaw
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:45 PM,
On Jul 15, 2013, at 00:26, Hage Yaapa wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jul 14, 2013, at 12:21, Hage Yaapa wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
It appear to require that I publish my source on Github?
Not at all. Component can do many
Anyone could grab the private key from the github repo or npm tarball
and use it to decrypt communications with servers configured this way.
Is that true? I thought the certificate was only used to verify that the
server was the actual one it claimed to be. The encryption is something
include a generate a new self-signed key script, and run that on
server startup
If that is transparent to the person doing the installation then it is
perfect.
Thanks everyone. I can use the easy way during dev and add the right way
in prod.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Isaac Schlueter
A consistent sharding library for redis in node. Using 'crc32', 'hashring'.
View more: https://github.com/xichlo/redis-sharding
--
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because
module.js:340
throw err;
^
Error: Cannot find module './build/Release/hash_ring'
at Function.Module._resolveFilename (module.js:338:15)
at Function.Module._load (module.js:280:25)
at Module.require (module.js:364:17)
at require (module.js:380:17)
at
Hi,
I'm interested in doing some writing (haven't set up my own blog yet).
Would you share some info about yours?
Where we can see it (so we can read any content you've got so far, see your
branding, etc), as well as your intended audience / tone would be good.
Cheers,
Jed.
On Thursday,
Hi Martin Cooper,
I installed it with npm, the module hash_ring also installed auto. I'd to
rebuild module similar to redis-hard, use hashring module.
https://github.com/xichlo/redis-sharding
--
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Mark Hahn m...@hahnca.com wrote:
Is that true? I thought the certificate was only used to verify that the
server was the actual one it claimed to be. The encryption is something
different.
It sure is. See all the discussion in the news lately about perfect
22 matches
Mail list logo
