Re: [nodejs] Re: Ben Noordhuis's Departure

On Dec 7, 2013, at 9:57PM, Darren DeRidder wrote: > @isaac "First of all, to characterize Ben's departure, or the whole recent > drama, as being over pronoun usage, is a radical oversimplification." > > I'm glad to hear this admission but the fact remains Joyent characterized > things this wa

[nodejs] Re: Ben Noordhuis's Departure

@isaac "First of all, to characterize Ben's departure, or the whole recent drama, as being over pronoun usage, is a radical oversimplification." I'm glad to hear this admission but the fact remains Joyent characterized things this way. Cantrill's post "The Power of a Pronoun" makes it all about

Re: [nodejs] how to best develop two related modules simultaneously

Ah, yes thanks! On Saturday, December 7, 2013 6:51:07 PM UTC, Brian Di Palma wrote: > > npm link? > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Dave Horton > > wrote: > > I'm developing two related modules concurrently -- module A depends on > > module B. Neither is anywhere near a state where I want t

Re: [nodejs] how to best develop two related modules simultaneously

npm link? On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Dave Horton wrote: > I'm developing two related modules concurrently -- module A depends on > module B. Neither is anywhere near a state where I want to put them into > npm yet, so I can't simply have module A have a dependency on B in its > package.json

[nodejs] how to best develop two related modules simultaneously

I'm developing two related modules concurrently -- module A depends on module B. Neither is anywhere near a state where I want to put them into npm yet, so I can't simply have module A have a dependency on B in its package.json and leave it at that. I'm thinking what I will do is have the pro

Re: [nodejs] Re: node.js needs a new home

Isaac Schlueter wrote at 11:43 (EST) on Friday: > Thank you very much for the great analysis of the options here. I hope it was helpful. > I am getting the sense that we're pitching solutions rather than > exposing problems. Let's get a solid bug report and reproduction test > case before we rear

Re: [nodejs] Ben Noordhuis's Departure

 07.12.2013, 20:44, "// ravi" :On Dec 7, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Alex Kocharin wrote:07.12.2013, 19:13, "// ravi" :On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:59 PM, Nicholas Boll wrote:Should gendered pronouns be used in documentation? Maybe not. Should a comm

Re: [nodejs] Ben Noordhuis's Departure

On Dec 7, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Alex Kocharin wrote: > 07.12.2013, 19:13, "// ravi" : >> On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:59 PM, Nicholas Boll wrote: >>> Should gendered pronouns be used in documentation? Maybe not. Should a >>> community member be shunned after a misunderstanding? Definitely not - that >>>

Re: [nodejs] Ben Noordhuis's Departure

 07.12.2013, 19:13, "// ravi" :On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:59 PM, Nicholas Boll wrote:Should gendered pronouns be used in documentation? Maybe not. Should a community member be shunned after a misunderstanding? Definitely not - that would be intolerant. To many of us: “should ge

Re: [nodejs] Ben Noordhuis's Departure

On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:59 PM, Nicholas Boll wrote: > I'm disappointed to see something like this happen. It is intolerance in the > name of tolerance. A tolerant community does not waste time grandstanding > without understanding. The word 'bigot' was thrown around - which means a > person who s

[nodejs] Re: Ben Noordhuis's Departure

I don't really want to see anything about this anymore flare up across the interwebs. If I had any influence on libuv, I would pose the consideration of recreating the entire repo, dropping all history. It may be considered running from the past, but one can also look at it as a fresh start ;) I

Re: [nodejs] Ben Noordhuis's Departure

I'm disappointed to see something like this happen. It is intolerance in the name of tolerance. A tolerant community does not waste time grandstanding without understanding. The word 'bigot' was thrown around - which means a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc. It