On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Alex Kocharin a...@equenext.com wrote:
On Saturday, November 16, 2013 4:15:39 PM UTC+4, Hongli Lai wrote:
With the Unicorn model I believe you are referring to the supervising,
preforking server model, in which there is a master process that sets up
the
Well, that's extremely responsive, I appreciate that. I can't promise it
means that I'm going to switch to Phusion, but I will be continuing to try
different things over the next few weeks, and this definitely helps.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Hongli Lai hon...@phusion.nl wrote:
On Sat,
On Friday, November 15, 2013 4:19:25 AM UTC-5, Alex Kocharin wrote:
On Thursday, November 14, 2013 8:22:16 PM UTC+4, Eric Mill wrote:
I'm totally fine being told that the Unicorn model is the wrong way to
think of things in Node. But what are the best practices
There is no such thing
I'm totally fine being told that the Unicorn model is the wrong way to
think of things in Node. But what are the best practices for deploying a
Node app where I'd like to be able to scale the number of processes up and
down easily on a box? The model I'm used to is putting nginx in front,
having
Hi Oleg,
Could you describe how simpleio would be preferable to using
sockjshttp://sockjs.org/?
It was also borne out of frustration with socket.io, and I've had a great
experience with it.
-- Eric
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Oleg Slobodskoi oleg...@googlemail.comwrote:
Forgot to
I had a live chat room running in the dev console of isitchristmas.com this
past Christmas for a 9-day
experimenthttp://konklone.com/post/the-making-of-isitchristmas-dot-com-2012,
and I got a few flooders who loved writing for loops filled with nastiness.
I did three things to combat them:
a)
For anyone who tries to do this, it was just a few lines:
https://gist.github.com/konklone/5006662
On Monday, April 25, 2011 10:09:33 AM UTC-4, Francois Laberge wrote:
Thanks. It communicates over wifi so typically it takes about 1/150th of a
second to communicate.
Francois
On Mon, Apr
Or `uname -a`. Either way, the solution is to run this as a system command
(through Node), not through a specific Node function.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Roger WANG roger.w...@linux.intel.comwrote:
kuno neok...@gmail.com writes:
I want to know which linux distribution that my node
.
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, January 6, 2013, Eric Mill wrote:
.
Developers' responses to specific questions/suggestions with Why do you
want to do that? It sounds like you're making bad decisions. is a cliche
that still happens
It can often be a good idea to add comments for yourself and others around
your dependencies, especially on a large project. It doesn't mean you made
bad choices about your dependencies. When stuff gets large, it helps to
group things, label them, etc.
As package.json's get used for more and more
Some of you are being extremely derisive to a reasonable suggestion. You
may not think it is a suggestion worth adopting, and it may not be, but
it's being made seriously and has stated reasons behind it. Explain why you
don't see the problem raised as enough of a problem to merit the change,
but
Well I'm not arguing against the policy! Due to the intrinsic nature of
npm (e.g. we don't see GitHub enforce such a policy), it's a measure to
decrease scarcity of names for package maintainers, and it seems to
accomplishes that.
That's a fair point. The purposes of Github are obviously
The stereotype of developers responding to questions for help with why do
you want to do that? instead of an actual answer continues...
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Network Individual
networkindivid...@gmail.com wrote:
I wanted a new line for every line i wrote to have neat spacing little
13 matches
Mail list logo
