This is a very broad question to be asking, and sounds dangerously like
"please do all my research and make my decisions for me".
They are all rather different things, and spending 30 minutes looking at
each would tell you that and narrow your question down to something more
reasonably answerable.
This might be helpful to some people, but I'd hazard caution - my
experience has been that a lot of relative path requires tells me that I've
got a pile of modules screaming to get out :)
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Boris Filipov wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've created a simple prototype tool fo
Ooh, I've not seen police before - I'll be using that
On 31 Jan 2013, at 17:15, Martin Wawrusch wrote:
So it is basically an online version of police (
https://github.com/pksunkara/npm-police). Good idea, I would love to see it
for private github and bitbucket repos though.
On Thu, Jan 31, 201
I couldn't find something to do this, so I wrote one - or maybe it's
only me who suffers the problem of working on a dozen modules at the
same time (or offline more the case), and then not knowing which need
pushing, committing, versioning, publishing etc when I come online
again.
I pulled togethe
I don't even..
Sent from my iPhone
On 31 Jan 2013, at 04:44, tjholowaychuk wrote:
> OO is super flawed
>
> On Jan 30, 3:15 am, fengchun.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi, Senior JS fans
>>
>> I am a senior Java/JS developer about 12 year+. I recently wrote a
>> specification named JCS. The goal of t
Hi Fengchun - these are not problems you are describing, but features in
your JCS specification.
It might be useful to us if you described the problems you had that led to
the creation of these features, in order to better understand why they now
exist.
Thanks :-)
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12
Hah
That's cool, kept me occupied for at least five minutes which is probably a
record for npm module announcements on this list ;)
Rob
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Mathias Buus Madsen wrote:
> Tetris in color in your terminal using node:
>
>https://github.com/mafintosh/tetris
>
> Tha
bring the CPU up to
your tolerance limits then you can use this as a guide for using their
per-user scaling settings.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Rob Ashton wrote:
> I'll second this, but with the knowledge that if you're doing a
> synchronous time-step based simulation
I'll second this, but with the knowledge that if you're doing a synchronous
time-step based simulation and just using the server version of this to be
the 'master' in decision making then know you can end up with JS with
'heavy' CPU use on the server. Providing this CPU is spread out over the
frame
I'm afraid it has gone already (pending a response from Mikeal)
Sorry!
Rob
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:19 AM, codepilot Account wrote:
> What info do you need?
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:49 AM, codepilot Account wrote:
>
>> Can I have it?
>>
>>
>> On
first
case and can actually make it (I don't want my space going to waste), my
ticket is going for *free*, you just need to be the first to reply to this
e-mail so we can exchange details and I can pass the relevant info back to
Mikeal.
Cheers,
Rob Ashton
http://twitter.com/robashton
--
Not sure if troll or...
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Marak Squires wrote:
> I was wondering why Github sent me 50 emails today all starting with "Hello,
> ladies..."
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Arnout Kazemier wrote:
>
>> It's using the NPM registery in alphabetical order as all f
Haha, nicely put - I think also that code that is easy and non brittle
to change is much preferable than some of the designs that bad usage
of IOC containers leads towards
Not that I am suggesting this is what the OP wants, just where it may lead. :)
Sent from my iPhone
On 29 Jul 2012, at 18:23
Oh, and apologies to everybody that I even linked to a GoF related article
on a node mailing list, I'll try not to do this again in the near future.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Rob Ashton wrote:
> And I don't think the problem boils down to stubbing out the require
> sys
node-sandboxed<https://github.com/felixge/node-sandboxed-module>
> works
>
> @Rob Ashton For a unit test I don't really want to be hitting an
> external environment. A good example is if you make a http call to another
> api, at the unit test level you just want to make
s not it is not necessarily the best
> technique for javascript.
>
> @Oliver Leics that looks a bit like how
> node-sandboxed<https://github.com/felixge/node-sandboxed-module>
> works
>
> @Rob Ashton For a unit test I don't really want to be hitting an
> external
you dependency injection and IoC. We use it a lot in
>> flatiron, it's pretty sweet.
>>
>> --Josh
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Rob Ashton
>> wrote:
>> > Yeah, sorry
>> >
>> > Not a real developer, never worked on a real pr
-served-yui3.html
And yes, once you have had the pleasure of using it on non-trivial apps you
miss it dearly when dealing with the ad-hoc structured or 'good enough
rolled' alternatives.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Rob As
NICE,
Haven't clicked through yet due to being on the phone but this sounds
like a great effort!
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Jul 2012, at 19:15, Nikhil Marathe wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have been working on a sort of libuv guide book - 'An introduction
> to libuv' for the past few days.
> You can
Do we need dependency injection in nodejs? Well - if you mean dependency
injection literally, we have it already, it looks like this
function doSomething(dependency) {
}
doSomething(new FooDependency())
or
doSomething(new BarDependency())
or
var Animal = function(vocals) {
this.vocals = vo
It's an un-conference, which means that it'll be decided ad-hoc, there
isn't really an up front agenda/schedule save from 'turn up on this day'
and 'leave on this day'
The best thing about this event is that it's chilled, small, and more about
the discussion and meeting folk than having uni-direct
I'll be doing likewise Duncan,
My plans are to hopefully spend a day or two at some start-up somewhere
pairing with somebody on something and hopefully learning something (if
anybody is interested in having me let me know)
Apart from that, I can recommend hanging out at wine bars, more wine bars,
If you like foursquare, you should go
Really,
Come be a part of our community and put a ball to your face
:-)
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Nuno Job wrote:
> If you like node, you should go.
>
> Really.
>
> Come be part of our community and put a face to your name :)
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 25,
Hey,
We encountered some fun times with Zombie today, which has dependencies
listed of
"dependencies": {
"eventsource": "~0.0.5",
"html5": "~0.3.8",
"jsdom": "=0.2.14",
"mime": "~1.2.5",
"ms": "~0.1.0",
"q": "~0.8.4",
"request": "~2.9.202",
"tough-cookie": "~0.9.
*The real question is why wouldn't you want a piece of that?*
*
*
As an enterprise monkey, I can see that most people don't - they want to
drag and drop some web services onto a form control and if it doesn't work,
find somebody who knows more about framework 'x' to spend time debugging it.
That m
Hi,
This is wrong
IIS might have a thread pool but has also had the ability to do
non-blocking IO for years
The default behaviour of ASP.NET and associated frameworks and the
developers using these tools has been to use all the synchronous
functionalities available and ignore this - but it is
Not sure why we need anything other than a flat hierarchy of objects in
order to do OOP...
On 22 May 2012, at 21:53, Duncan Gmail wrote:
Not sure about using OOP instead of functional.
But leaving that aside, what differentiates this from the Server-side
MooTools?
On 22 May 2012, at 18:07, Jeff
See
browserify
requirejs
stitch
everything else under 'module loader'
There is a thread somewhere a week or so ago with a list of these in them,
I personally just use RequireJS even though it isn't cool
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Robert Chris Bang Larsen <
rob...@komogvind.dk> wrote:
> Hi
s on node 0.6 with no problems.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 27, 2012, at 6:05 AM, Rob Ashton wrote:
>
> " Not outdated :), developed for node 0.2.x "
>
> (Last commit is 5 months ago)
>
> That's a joke right? :P
>
> Rob
>
> On Fri, Apr
rirangan> | Review19<http://review19.com>
> "Make
> better decisions"
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Rob Ashton wrote:
>
>> https://github.com/appsattic/node-awssum
>>
>> This is quite active
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:53 A
https://github.com/appsattic/node-awssum
This is quite active
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Srirangan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Search on NNPM didn't get me any results.
>
> Is there a well maintained Amazon AWS S3 library / SDK for Node.js?
>
> If not, I'll be building one. Will probably end up usi
It is a non-question, because node itself doesn't make any decisions over
this stuff
So the answer to your question is "It depends which template engine you are
using"
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:03 PM, akira wrote:
> Is the content rendered in templates autoecasped by default? Does it
> depend o
I try c9 from time to time, but it has serious quality issues and there is
*always* some show stopping bug within 10 minutes of logging in.
Keen to hear of viable alternatives
On 8 Apr 2012, at 08:31, Srirangan wrote:
Ryan,
You can probably evaluate the many browser based IDEs.
Cloud9IDE (htt
I only thought of this last night, but the little project I am doing
for a 48 hour game jam is kinda OO based, although with very shallow
dependency graphs (so no useful DI patterns there), and with a bit of
inheritance of a sort (not sure if underscore extend really counts,
but it is generally all
I thought snapshots also included the source code - at least that was my
understanding from a previous thread on the same matter?
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Ben Noordhuis wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 16:56, Jeremy Rudd
> wrote:
> > What: Can NodeJS apps be distributed as binary? ie. y
35 matches
Mail list logo
