+1
Please start a new post and explain why you need 10k apps ( thats a huge
effing number in that context ); for a particular application, or just for
research?
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Marak Squires wrote:
> I'd recommend starting a new mailing list post explaining the problem you
> are
It's important to understand that the overhead of context switching in V8
is pretty painful when compared to Python. I'm doing a bit of work myself
embedding v8 in a fairly intensive environment, and it's been a hell of a
learning experience. There's a *metric s*** ton* of difference between the
st
This is great. :D
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Klaus Silveira wrote:
> I just wanted to share the amazing work of a friend of mine. It is a c6502
> NES compiler written with node.js, featuring real-time compilation,
> built-in sprite editor and code editor, and a nice little integration
> wi
When you have highly structured data with high levels of interdependence,
such as lots of numbers that all depend upon one another - i.e bank
accounts - you use SQL.
When you have fairly unstructured, loose data that is fairly independent,
such as content - i.e you are building a blog or another
Yeah, I couldn't agree with Dan more. Consistency is super important,
especially for a core lib. I mean, it could be worse, b ut, it should be
addressed rather than ignored.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Dan Milon wrote:
> Thats what PHP thought about deprecation also. See where this got them
Why not just decorate fs.exists with arguments.caller.length and call it a
day? It seems like there are arguments on both sides here to accept the new
standard and the old tradition. Eventually phasing out the old tradition
has to happen ( especially since you know, not 1.0 or anything here ), but
Ah, nevermind. Realized why. :/
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Stewart Mckinney wrote:
> Why not just decorate fs.exists with arguments.caller.length and call it a
> day? It seems like there are arguments on both sides here to accept the new
> standard and the old tradition. E
I wouldn't say you end up with "less useful" knowledge in Rails. There are
a lot of good patterns in the internals, which you will end up reading at
some point. The knowledge about Rails' conventions is somewhat situational
but even then you can apply similar concepts to Node applications , such as
I don't think Marak was attempting to do anything other than inform the
community he was stepping down. It got emotional, sure, but you can't blame
him for that.
Sometimes its hard to contain your emotion in these situations, because you
have a lot invested in it. Sometimes, your entire body and s
*explaining why someone was potentially let go when you don't know the
situation yourself.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Stewart Mckinney wrote:
> I don't think Marak was attempting to do anything other than inform the
> community he was stepping down. It got emotional, sur
I'm not really sure that the "define outside of loop" form is actually less
readable, but I have a suspicion that Crankshaft ( V8's optimizing pipeline
) would notice that you are redefining/executing the same function in the
loop ( since there is no branch statement ) and optimize the definition o
He's an opinionated guy, but I would like to hear why he felt that way. You
really don't have many people who have seen as much as he has, working in
the video game interactive industry, then the web, then taking several
major architect roles at massive corporations. It's worthwhile at least
hearin
And I can't do math. At all.
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Stewart Mckinney wrote:
> He's an opinionated guy, but I would like to hear why he felt that way.
> You really don't have many people who have seen as much as he has, working
> in the video game interactiv
OSX local, Ubuntu remote, and vim/tmux
Reasons: homogeneity ( no learning of two editors, I use the same server
side and locally ), and tmux allows me to have multiple sessions locally
and remotely ( I have tmux all up in my tmux ).
Also, vim has a lot of plugins and i've been diving into making
That's pretty much my take. It's nice to see he is enthusiastic about
his endeavors, and I wish him the best of luck, but for me if you are not
going to show me any code, why are you posting it in this forum?
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Sotonin wrote:
> I've kept quiet on this thread to see
I'm just curious as to why having Node run on top of the Java run time is
better than say, vanilla C++ compiled Node running naively. Doesn't it run
on pretty much every popular platform now, anyway?
If you are going to build out new services in Node.js, why not simply
create auxiliary architectur
*natively. Christ.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Stewart Mckinney wrote:
> I'm just curious as to why having Node run on top of the Java run time is
> better than say, vanilla C++ compiled Node running naively. Doesn't it run
> on pretty much every popular platform now, any
May I say, I endorse Mark Hahn for nice-police, 2012.
Also , much agreed with what Issacs said w.r.t "talk less, code and show
more". If you don't want to show us all of your code, why not talk about
some of the general concepts in a few blog posts, or create a contrived
example that sort of touch
my vote is a), go for it
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:32 PM, mscdex wrote:
> On Oct 9, 6:21 pm, codepilot Account wrote:
> > Just out of curiosity, will this be the last nail in the coffin of
> 'binary'
> > encoding? At least as the default, I mean.
>
> As a default, I'd hope so.
>
> Last nail in t
CouchDB is fine, if you don't like its performance, use CouchBase.
Redis is fine too, and MongoDB is fine. IMHO Couch is easiest, and its not
hard to migrate from Couch to Mongo/Redis if you are still prototyping and
prepping for scale.
Just don't use SQL to store a chat log.
Content = noSQL
Num
> Redis is fine too, and MongoDB is fine.
> How to use MongoDB, seems there's no way to take an instant (sort of
> instant) feed of events?
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 3:45:33 AM UTC+4, Stewart McKinney wrote:
>
>> CouchDB is fine, if you don't like its
+1
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Tom Ashworth wrote:
> When picking a database, I think it's a bad idea to start by looking at
> all the databases available to you and comparing their features. That's
> like comparing all the vehicles available to you for a trap, picking a
> supersonic jet b
>
> If that has traditionally been customary in open source then take note
> that node is breaking from that tradition in the interest of creating a
> more inclusive and humane community.
I hate to say it, but from all my observation of this community for the
last three years, I have to say the e
>
> +1 for moving on - once joyent takes down that blog post.
>
> The post should be taken down, because referring to a person who is not
> your employee, and then describing (with great disdain), what you would do
> to them if they were your employee is, at the very least, bad form. At
> worst, i
Wait; is that for real? ( 20 minute limit? )
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Mikeal Rogers wrote:
> All talks are 20 minutes this year :)
>
> On Mar 15, 2012, at March 15, 20123:38 PM, Marco Rogers wrote:
>
> The call for speakers is open for NodeConf 2012. I want to talk about
> streams in node
h good. But do you see as the venue for people who want more
>> in depth talks about node? I think the community needs that as well.
>>
>> Either way, I have some ideas about how to make an awesome 20 minutes
>> about streams.
>>
>> :Marco
>>
>>
>>
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:53 PM, TipTop wrote:
> So I would like to know where node thinks it will be in 1 year?
>
> What are things that are been looked at for improvement with node as a
> whole?
>
> At some point nodes going to run into a wall, and that wall is javascript.
> I feel that js is no
The reason why you use args.This() instead of creating an empty
Value and appending keys to that is partially due to the way the
"new" operator works in JavaScript when called with a function and
operating in accordance with that when "faking" JS object creation via C++
functions. Roughly speaking,
Hey wait who hired the troll?
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Dennis Kane wrote:
>
> Seems like you still have a long way to go to reach that. :D
>>
>> I don't think it should be too much longer before I can start making some
> sales calls based on the progress I've already made.
>
>>
>>
>> Wel
It's similar to a rose..
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:44 AM, David Whitten wrote:
> Wanna avoid process load?
>
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Marak Squires wrote:
>
>> Can you code?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:24 PM, rajesh wrote:
>>
>>> What is node?
>>>
>>> On May 2, 10:22 am, rajesh
My head asplode!
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Marak Squires wrote:
> You send node?
>
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Mark Hahn wrote:
>
>> I hab a code.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Stewart Mckinney wrote:
>>
>>> It&#x
ahn wrote:
>>
>>> This skit is getting silly.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Marak Squires
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> But how to node?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:04 AM,
I'm pretty sure its legit as long as the module's build is organized in
such a way as to provide the binaries/link the binaries as a fallback and
not necessarily as a first option. i.e, if the module can compile natively,
it should do so, but otherwise if it cannot, see if there is a supported
bina
1) Pretty tight. The abstraction layer between v8 and node isn't thick
enough or generalized enough, from what I can tell. To be fair, writing an
abstraction layer between multiple JS engines is very difficult (I am doing
such now for a different project, non-web related). JSC and v8, for
instance,
Is there any quantification on what "N" might be?
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Joran Greef wrote:
> Hash implementation quality being equal, C++ may be faster for hash inputs
> greater than N bytes where the cost of jumping between JS and C++ does not
> outweigh the benefit. For keys smalle
Also, isn't it not the key size, but the # of keys?
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Stewart Mckinney wrote:
> Is there any quantification on what "N" might be?
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Joran Greef wrote:
>
>> Hash implementation quality being
36 matches
Mail list logo
