@Vladimir I don't understand that exactly
@Fedor Do you use NPM?
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Fedor Indutny wrote:
> Heya!
>
> Its quite interesting to see you naming your project "bud", since I've
> just released a TLS terminator with the same name:
> https://github.com/indutny/bud . Hehe,
Heya!
Its quite interesting to see you naming your project "bud", since I've
just released a TLS terminator with the same name:
https://github.com/indutny/bud . Hehe, but thumbs up for it! Looking
quite promising.
Cheers,
Fedor.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Vladimir Varankin wrote:
> Nice p
Nice project, it looks very clean and much easier than Make, but still very
familiar.
Are there any examples of task-generation during execution.
Imaging, that you run a chain of tasks A → B. So during "B" node execution,
you decide, than "A" couldn't be managed without another node "C", so the
Makefiles are too easy to break, takes your hours for accomplishing
simplest tasks like building bunch of targets and watching for changes,
it's imperative, and gets bloated quickly.
Here is an example: https://gist.github.com/azer/4974781
I'd never spend any time on it but can't say anything if
> For global commands outside of the project directory, you’d use the
> *cmd*function:
You can implement es6 proxy instead to run these commands without "cmd".
But why not just use make, anyway? Atwood's Law?
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 5:54:10 AM UTC+4, azer wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> I've writt
