On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:38:48AM -0500, Marcel Laverdet wrote:
> Sanitization is not difficult. Just escape 5 or so HTML control characters.
Depends on whether you just want to escape everything or to allow some things.
pgpgraBk32TW4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Sanitization is not difficult. Just escape 5 or so HTML control characters.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:06 PM, dmh2000 wrote:
> because sanitization is pretty difficult and Anti-Samy has a strong
> organization backing it up. that said, I'm sure the existing npm modules
> are good.
>
> http://www.
because sanitization is pretty difficult and Anti-Samy has a strong
organization backing it up. that said, I'm sure the existing npm modules
are good.
http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/2008/08/31/DevelopersUsingLibrariesIsNotASignOfWeakness.aspx
On Friday, March 2, 2012 3:30:39 PM UTC-8, mscdex
On Mar 2, 5:45 pm, dmh2000 wrote:
> i posted a gist on github with an example, using Joe Ferners node-java
> to interface to the AntiSamy java library for HTML
> sanitizationhttps://gist.github.com/1961957
Why not use something with less overhead, like one of the sanitization
modules already on
