[nodejs] Re: NodeJS downloadable Docs

2012-02-23 Thread Jeremy Rudd
Can someone please upload my CHM/ZIP on the Node website under to Docs folder? -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. T

[nodejs] Re: NodeJS downloadable Docs

2012-02-23 Thread Jeremy Rudd
Thanks TC, But .markdown files cannot be natively viewed on usual computers. HTML/ CHM is a more friendly format. JR On Feb 23, 11:19 pm, "T.C. Hollingsworth" wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Jeremy Rudd > wrote: > > Hi, > > > I couldn't find a downloadable version of the NodeJS docs

[nodejs] Re: NodeJS downloadable Docs

2012-02-24 Thread mscdex
On Feb 24, 2:26 am, "T.C. Hollingsworth" wrote: > It is just markdown in git though. Sorry, forgot about that. You can do `make doc` or `make docs` to generate the HTML from the markdown. Although currently the Makefile has to be modified for this to work properly with the 0.6.x tarball from the

[nodejs] Re: NodeJS downloadable Docs

2012-02-27 Thread Shancat
If you're running on a low power computer then you might have difficulty rendering the whole page at once. On Feb 25, 7:05 pm, dolphin 278 wrote: > Sorry guys, may be i don't get it - why to bother with chm, or any other > efforts, if at any moment you > havehttp://nodejs.org/docs/latest/api/all

[nodejs] Re: NodeJS downloadable Docs

2012-02-29 Thread GottZ
the docs are within the source file as compiled to html node- v0.6.11.tar.gz/node-v0.6.11/doc/api/api -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G

Re: [nodejs] Re: NodeJS downloadable Docs

2012-02-23 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Feb 23, 2012 11:52 PM, "Jeremy Rudd" wrote: > > Thanks TC, > > But .markdown files cannot be natively viewed on usual computers. HTML/ > CHM is a more friendly format. It's available in HTML in the tarball. It is just markdown in git though. Sorry, forgot about that. -T.C. -- Job Board: ht

Re: [nodejs] Re: NodeJS downloadable Docs

2012-02-24 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 24, 2012, at 00:52, Jeremy Rudd wrote: > But .markdown files cannot be natively viewed on usual computers. HTML/ > CHM is a more friendly format. I would think that finding a markdown viewer would not be difficult. -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://githu

Re: [nodejs] Re: NodeJS downloadable Docs

2012-02-24 Thread Matt
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Feb 24, 2012, at 00:52, Jeremy Rudd wrote: > > > But .markdown files cannot be natively viewed on usual computers. HTML/ > > CHM is a more friendly format. > > I would think that finding a markdown viewer would not be difficult. > It's

Re: [nodejs] Re: NodeJS downloadable Docs

2012-02-24 Thread Martin Cooper
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Feb 24, 2012, at 00:52, Jeremy Rudd wrote: > >> But .markdown files cannot be natively viewed on usual computers. HTML/ >> CHM is a more friendly format. > > I would think that finding a markdown viewer would not be difficult. Yup. One g

Re: [nodejs] Re: NodeJS downloadable Docs

2012-02-25 Thread dolphin 278
Sorry guys, may be i don't get it - why to bother with chm, or any other efforts, if at any moment you have http://nodejs.org/docs/latest/api/all.html where all documentation already gathered in one single file? - Boris Egorov skype/gtalk/nickname: dolphin278 mobile: +7 905 728 1543 On Sa

Re: [nodejs] Re: NodeJS downloadable Docs

2012-02-25 Thread Joshua Holbrook
You, sir, have made an excellent point. I'm now wondering the same. --Josh On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:05 AM, dolphin 278 wrote: > Sorry guys, may be i don't get it - why to bother with chm, or any other > efforts, if at any moment you > have http://nodejs.org/docs/latest/api/all.html where all d

Re: [nodejs] Re: NodeJS downloadable Docs

2012-02-27 Thread dale tan
I think the main reason was for offline reasons. but one could argue to just save the all.html file as well. On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Shancat wrote: > If you're running on a low power computer then you might have > difficulty rendering the whole page at once. > > On Feb 25, 7:05 pm, dol