what you _could_ do, is instrument the code by parsing and inserting
additional calls.
with this technique you can add counters that make it safe to run
untrusted code.
so you can prevent things like: while (true);
which would loop forever. you could also use this technique to abort
any io
I'm interested in this question too. I tried it once, but all the async
operations started by the modules remained active even after unloading
it. Try for example a simple setInterval() that writes something to the log
every second, in the module - when you unload the module, the timer is
delete require.cache is not good way to unload.
Some times module doesn't get unloaded after deleting it from cache.
Modules api lacks unload method :(
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Ben thebucks...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm interested in this question too. I tried it once, but all the async
What is the use case of unloading a module?
On 06/14/2012 10:02 AM, yogesh agrawal wrote:
delete require.cache is not good way to unload.
Some times module doesn't get unloaded after deleting it from cache.
Modules api lacks unload method :(
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Ben
Does this mean NodeJs can change its code on-the-fly?
--
rubyonrailsx
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 at 3:02 PM, yogesh agrawal wrote:
delete require.cache is not good way to unload.
Some times module doesn't get unloaded after deleting
Of course it does. It's a dynamic language. You can redefine any function
at any time.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:08 AM, rubyonrailsx rubyonrai...@gmail.comwrote:
Does this mean NodeJs can change its code on-the-fly?
--
rubyonrailsx
Sent with Sparrow http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig
On
In our case, our xml builder like templates are javascript modules loaded
via require. Templates in development mode should not be cached. `delete
require.cache` works for us.
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 1:12:20 AM UTC-7, Dan Milon wrote:
What is the use case of unloading a module?
On
delete require.cache[the_absolute path_of_module];
is it what you want?
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 3:40:55 AM UTC+8, Andrew Finnell wrote:
I did some research in the group and it appears someone had a similar
question about unloading modules that were loaded with require.
Am I correct in
