Re: [nodejs] Re: many node vs single with eio.setMinParallel higher than 4

2013-01-04 Thread Ben Noordhuis
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:41 PM, am_p1 wrote: > It's working great but odbc to db2 queues and backs up some. I assume > because when using ps -eLf I can see that there are still only 4 threads per > node and the number doesn't change. > > Is the thread count suppose to change dynamically with libuv

Re: [nodejs] Re: many node vs single with eio.setMinParallel higher than 4

2013-01-04 Thread am_p1
It's working great but odbc to db2 queues and backs up some. I assume because when using ps -eLf I can see that there are still only 4 threads per node and the number doesn't change. Is the thread count suppose to change dynamically with libuv now? On Friday, January 4, 2013 11:20:31 AM UTC-5,

Re: [nodejs] Re: many node vs single with eio.setMinParallel higher than 4

2013-01-04 Thread Ben Noordhuis
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:57 PM, am_p1 wrote: > ok, so apparently eio is gone and libuv is what i'm actually using (not > knowing the history of node makes for a confusing day) > > no wonder eio or eio-simple didn't work :-) > > so I couldn't find any min/max controls on threads anywhere so i assu

[nodejs] Re: many node vs single with eio.setMinParallel higher than 4

2013-01-03 Thread am_p1
ok, so apparently eio is gone and libuv is what i'm actually using (not knowing the history of node makes for a confusing day) no wonder eio or eio-simple didn't work :-) so I couldn't find any min/max controls on threads anywhere so i assume that if i'm seeing queuing, my only choice is anothe

[nodejs] Re: many node vs single with eio.setMinParallel higher than 4

2013-01-03 Thread am_p1
left out that ALL node's would be long running (started just once in the morning) so no startup/teardown overhead... On Thursday, January 3, 2013 12:33:02 PM UTC-5, am_p1 wrote: > > So I'm seeing some queuing in my odbc to db2 path, I assume due to the > note on node-odbc's npm page re 4 threads