I agree, it's great for small apps but anything big can get messy.
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 4:16:30 PM UTC-4, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 3:52 PM, riadh chtara wrote:
>
>> And this is fully secure ,the original file is not sent to the client (it
>> will not be accessible throu
I think nowjs goes a long way to doing what you're talking about.
http://nowjs.com/doc/functions
for example.
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 3:52 PM, riadh chtara wrote:
> And this is fully secure ,the original file is not sent to the client (it
> will not be accessible through the server. Only the generated file is sent
> to the client.
> The goal of the framework is not to remove ajax, but to provide a fast
>
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 9:20 AM, riadh wrote:
> The main features of this new framework will be
>
> *automatic functions sharing between both server-side and client-side
> *automatic and easy ajax use
> *possibility to write node code in javascript client code like this
>
There's just too many w
Hi
I want to tell you about my new idea of a new javascript and node.js
framework.
I know that there is many frameworks for javascript like jQuery and
frameworks for node.js (express). And I think they are very good and
I'm not here to try to replace them.
The idea of node.in.js is to allow easy co
