[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14949142#comment-14949142
]
Josh Elser edited comment on ACCUMULO-4019 at 10/8/15 6:48 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
FYI [~afuchs], consider using {{mvn verify -DskipITs}} in the future. The build
was failing after your commits due to a checkstyle failure. I've since fixed
the build.
was (Author: elserj):
FYI [~afuchs], consider using {{mvn verify -DskipITs}} in the future. The build
was failing after your commits due to a checkstyle failure.
> thrift proxy no longer listening on all interfaces
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-4019
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4019
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: proxy
> Affects Versions: 1.7.0
> Reporter: Adam Fuchs
> Assignee: Adam Fuchs
> Fix For: 1.7.1, 1.8.0
>
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In updating the thrift proxy to use HostAndPort-style configuration, we
> changed the behavior from listening on all interfaces to only listening on
> the canonical host name interface. This broke the proxy for some users:
> {code}
> - TServer server = createProxyServer(AccumuloProxy.class,
> ProxyServer.class, port, protoFactoryClass, opts.prop);
> - server.serve();
> + HostAndPort address =
> HostAndPort.fromParts(InetAddress.getLocalHost().getCanonicalHostName(),
> port);
> + ServerAddress server = createProxyServer(address, protoFactory,
> opts.prop);
> {code}
> Does anybody know what prompted this change? To fix this, I think we should
> hardcode it to listen to all interfaces. Would the correct way of doing that
> be to use the following address?:
> {code}
> HostAndPort address = HostAndPort.fromParts("::", port);
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
