DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43144] tar task is very slow when a is used as the source resource

2010-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43144 Antoine Levy-Lambert changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.8Alpha (nightly) |1.8.0RC1 -- Configure bugm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43144] tar task is very slow when a is used as the source resource

2010-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43144 Antoine Levy-Lambert changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.8.0RC1|1.8.0 -- Configure bugmail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43144] tar task is very slow when a is used as the source resource

2010-03-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43144 Noel Grandin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||noelgran...@gmail.com -- Configure

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43144] tar task is very slow when a is used as the source resource

2010-03-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43144 --- Comment #2 from Noel Grandin 2010-03-15 14:06:55 UTC --- Having the same problem when using This makes it pretty much unusable when operating from a network drive. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apach

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43144] tar task is very slow when a is used as the source resource

2010-05-07 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43144 Antoine Levy-Lambert changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.8.0 |1.8.1 -- Configure bugmail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43144] tar task is very slow when a is used as the source resource

2010-12-27 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43144 Antoine Levy-Lambert changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.8.1 |1.8.2 -- Configure bugmail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43144] tar task is very slow when a is used as the source resource

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43144 --- Comment #1 from Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-18 01:39:55 PST --- no, it is an implementation artifact. We open and close the zip archive for each entry (because right now we wouldn't know when to close it otherwise).