https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #20 from Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-28 04:55:54
PST ---
Alvaro,
in your case it is the sheer number of symbolic links together with a strange
decision made by Apple about their symlinks.
If I read the logs
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #19 from Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-21 08:26:20
PST ---
I have no idea what the DWR2 project might be.
Even if my iBook's display hadn't decided to break down a few months ago
(making me an ex-Mac owner sin
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #18 from Alvaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-17 15:11:01 PST ---
Hi Stefan:
I have attached the project compile task log (DWR2 build logs) and the
build.properties and build.xml in a compressed zip file (build.properties and
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #17 from Alvaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-17 15:07:35 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22752)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22752)
build.properties and build.xml compressed
Here I attach the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #16 from Alvaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-17 15:05:01 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22751)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22751)
DWR2 build logs
Here I attach the logs of the compile proces
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #15 from Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-17 07:24:23
PST ---
you see the different JDKs because one of your symlinks is pointing to a parent
directory of all your JDKs, namely the one that holds the Versions dire
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #14 from Alvaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-16 13:49:52 PST ---
I have checkout and compile today ant-core trunk from SVN.
Changing MAX_LEVELS_OF_SYMLINKS=3, after 10 mins of dwr2 compile task execution
and after the --too
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #13 from Alvaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-16 13:47:40 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22748)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22748)
logs from compile task
The logs I get from compile (run comp
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #12 from Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-16 03:29:02
PST ---
Detecting whether a certain filesystem object is a symbolic link is
surprisingly wasteful in Java (both in terms of time as well as memory
required), s
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
Alvaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Reso
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #9 from Tim Whittington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-22 03:17:53
PST ---
I downloaded and built the ant_20080922041906.tar.gz snapshot, and ran it
against my build, and the compile now appears to complete successfully.
I'd
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |1.8.0
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #6 from Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-04 07:30:05 PST
---
dev thread started http://marc.info/?l=ant-dev&m=122053158307830&w=2
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #5 from Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-04 00:50:38 PST
---
Matt: yes, I think it is doable, even without too many or too big changes, but
we need to think through some scenarios first to decide what to do. I'll
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #4 from Tim Whittington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-03 19:04:48
PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I'm not convinced that ignoring the symlink completely is the right thing to
> do, we probably should follow it but make sur
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #3 from Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-03 08:28:39 PST ---
looks like that won't work after all (protected scandir), but DS is written in
a stateful way, so something could be done.
--
Configure bugmail: https://
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #2 from Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-03 07:52:36 PST ---
Generally a lot of the internals of DirectoryScanner are private, so we can
likely change signatures to pass around an e.g. Stack if needed.
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-03 07:50:04 PST
---
I'm not convinced that ignoring the symlink completely is the right thing to
do, we probably should follow it but make sure we don't scan directories we
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||notifications@
21 matches
Mail list logo
