amyrprv closed issue #11945: help request: How to Add New Luarocks Dependencies
in APISIX Docker Environment?
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11945
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
bzp2010 opened a new pull request, #11988:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/11988
### Description
This PR is intended to address the following issues:
- Sometimes grpc-web requests incorrectly contain two trailer blocks, which
according to grpc's protocol requirements
bzp2010 commented on PR #11987:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/11987#issuecomment-2676638954
We should consider the design of the configuration items more carefully, as
it may not align with ergonomic best practices. I'd appreciate your feedback.
--
This is an automated messag
bzp2010 commented on code in PR #11987:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/11987#discussion_r1966678412
##
apisix/plugins/openid-connect.lua:
##
@@ -547,6 +575,40 @@ function _M.rewrite(plugin_conf, ctx)
return 403, core.json.encode(error_response)
bzp2010 commented on code in PR #11987:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/11987#discussion_r1966678247
##
apisix/plugins/openid-connect.lua:
##
@@ -89,6 +90,33 @@ local schema = {
type = "string",
default = "apisix",
},
+claim_
nic-chen commented on code in PR #11987:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/11987#discussion_r1966676298
##
apisix/plugins/openid-connect.lua:
##
@@ -89,6 +90,33 @@ local schema = {
type = "string",
default = "apisix",
},
+claim
bzp2010 commented on PR #11822:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/11822#issuecomment-2676381076
I don't think it's a good idea to just do dirty patches like this on the
route spec. If it is ok to extend the limit values, then the same thing should
be done for all resources.
bzp2010 commented on issue #11821:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11821#issuecomment-2676378948
The "problem" does exist, so the question is how we should address it, and
that topic can be continued on your PR.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
bzp2010 commented on issue #11876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11876#issuecomment-2676376406
Doesn't your custom load balancer algorithm work after placing it in the
apisix/balancer directory? Do you have any error logs?
If your question is on how to write a load bala
bzp2010 commented on issue #11885:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11885#issuecomment-2676375030
#5608
https://github.com/patroni/patroni/issues/3071
https://github.com/patroni/patroni/pull/3073
You need to make TLS and Auth separate in etcd, i.e. not use CommonN
bzp2010 commented on issue #11915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11915#issuecomment-2676372787
It doesn't make much sense why log-rotate would need to be used or work
properly if the error logs will be output to a standard error device.
When you use /dev/stderr, log tru
bzp2010 commented on issue #11909:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11909#issuecomment-2676370292
You can make any changes on your own copy of the plugin, just copy the file
and change its name. After that, copy it back to the container.
If you want this functionality to b
bzp2010 commented on issue #11945:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11945#issuecomment-2676368140
@amyrprv
The debian package repository contains dependencies that are not always
up-to-date (for some libraries, the version may be locked), so you must
download the source
bzp2010 commented on issue #11948:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11948#issuecomment-2676366094
Generally this has to do with how discrete the requests are on your API
service, which is related to multiple metrics such as route_id, resp_code, or
even consumer_id, etc.
(https:
bzp2010 commented on issue #11950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11950#issuecomment-2676362684
It may have something to do with a misunderstanding when the last document
was archived. I'll see what I can do to restore access.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
bzp2010 commented on issue #11953:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11953#issuecomment-2676361951
APISIX is not directly associated with any Kubernetes version, either as a
function of the API gateway or the built-in Kubernetes service discovery
(unless Kubernetes has modified i
bzp2010 commented on issue #11959:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11959#issuecomment-2676353665
This means that this node needs to be skipped when the Consul response does
not contain the port or any of the fields we need, right?
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
bzp2010 commented on issue #11955:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11955#issuecomment-2676355097
What exactly does this lead to? I mean functionally and security wise.
The current code does work properly. Can you provide more context?
--
This is an automated message from th
bzp2010 commented on issue #11978:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11978#issuecomment-2676352350
If your upstream has to be accessed by a domain, I think you may be using
some kind of LB that will pass the domain name to discover some kind of
“virtual server”, which only allows
bzp2010 commented on issue #11984:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11984#issuecomment-2676342999
This is usually related to the logger plugin not being able to handle log
uploads correctly, such as network errors or authentication errors. When a data
batch upload fails and the
bzp2010 commented on issue #11977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/11977#issuecomment-2676345538
1. 检查网关前的任何潜在L4/L7负载均衡器，确认它们是不是具有并开启了响应体缓冲。
2. 如果网关前没有任何负载均衡器，则尝试使用自定义NGINX配置以关闭 proxy_buffering,
https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/customize-nginx-configuration/
-
raylan-chen opened a new pull request, #2357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix-ingress-controller/pull/2357
### Type of change:
- [x] Bugfix
- [ ] New feature provided
- [ ] Improve performance
- [ ] Backport patches
- [ ] Documentation
- [ ] Refactor
- [ ] Chore
bzp2010 opened a new pull request, #11987:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/11987
### Description
Add JWT audience authentication to the OpenID Connect plugin, which allows:
- Asserts that the claim must exist, otherwise the request is rejected.
- Asserts that it sh
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #11445:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/11445#issuecomment-2676129940
This pull request/issue has been closed due to lack of activity. If you
think that is incorrect, or the pull request requires review, you can revive
the PR at any time.
--
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #11445: feat(cas-auth): support
logged-in user header
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/11445
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
25 matches
Mail list logo
