[GitHub] [apisix] tokers commented on issue #7260: feat: As a user, I want to add header rewriting to traffict_split plugin, so that it simplifies the setting of multiple lanes

tokers commented on issue #7260: URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7260#issuecomment-1161031265 > So let's just add it directly to `traffic-split` first? Even we do it on this plugin, we still need to consider the code reusability, so that we can migrate to the new way easi

[GitHub] [apisix] tokers commented on issue #7260: feat: As a user, I want to add header rewriting to traffict_split plugin, so that it simplifies the setting of multiple lanes

tokers commented on issue #7260: URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7260#issuecomment-1159871642 > Or put the headers field to the upstream object, so we can use it in a more general way, not just traffic-split. Sounds good. -- This is an automated message from the Apache

[GitHub] [apisix] tokers commented on issue #7260: feat: As a user, I want to add header rewriting to traffict_split plugin, so that it simplifies the setting of multiple lanes

tokers commented on issue #7260: URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7260#issuecomment-1159603439 > 用于多泳道和全链路灰度场景，流量带上泳道标签，调用对应泳道的后端服务，后端微服务采用全链路跟踪技术透传泳道标签，持续调用泳道内的分组实例。 Fair enough, @spacewander What's your opinion? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi

[GitHub] [apisix] tokers commented on issue #7260: feat: As a user, I want to add header rewriting to traffict_split plugin, so that it simplifies the setting of multiple lanes

tokers commented on issue #7260: URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7260#issuecomment-1157427948 @hexiaofeng What's the use case about the change? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above