rbowen merged PR #43:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/43
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on code in PR #43:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/43#discussion_r1665557158
##
wg-advisors/why/why_branding_licencing.md:
##
@@ -1,13 +1,68 @@
# Why we should look after the project's brand and licencing
-TODO:
-
## Summary
potiuk commented on PR #43:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/43#issuecomment-2208717949
Applied comments.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
potiuk commented on code in PR #43:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/43#discussion_r1665554435
##
wg-advisors/why/why_branding_licencing.md:
##
@@ -1,13 +1,68 @@
# Why we should look after the project's brand and licencing
-TODO:
-
## Summary
potiuk commented on code in PR #43:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/43#discussion_r1665557506
##
wg-advisors/why/why_branding_licencing.md:
##
@@ -1,13 +1,68 @@
# Why we should look after the project's brand and licencing
-TODO:
-
## Summary
potiuk commented on PR #43:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/43#issuecomment-2185309451
As the next "why" I proposed some "why" for branding/licencing in the
"advisors" working group. This is my understanding on why licensing and
branding and taking care about it
potiuk opened a new pull request, #43:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/43
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
