[GitHub] evsukov89 commented on issue #831: Filter _changes by key to speed up replication

2018-07-15 Thread GitBox
evsukov89 commented on issue #831: Filter _changes by key to speed up replication URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/831#issuecomment-405105548 @wohali thank you. Yes as I said – works for us because we have a very narrow controlled use-case, I do not believe this should

[GitHub] evsukov89 commented on issue #831: Filter _changes by key to speed up replication

2018-07-15 Thread GitBox
evsukov89 commented on issue #831: Filter _changes by key to speed up replication URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/831#issuecomment-405090786 @whoali lets take an example: you have an app that uses couchdb as the main data storage. It is intended to be used with offline-first

[GitHub] evsukov89 commented on issue #831: Filter _changes by key to speed up replication

2018-02-07 Thread GitBox
evsukov89 commented on issue #831: Filter _changes by key to speed up replication URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/831#issuecomment-363752134 @nickva I guess i know the answer: to build `_changes` feed the changes themselves have to be indexed somewhere, meaning a similar to `

[GitHub] evsukov89 commented on issue #831: Filter _changes by key to speed up replication

2018-02-06 Thread GitBox
evsukov89 commented on issue #831: Filter _changes by key to speed up replication URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/831#issuecomment-363205174 @nickva is theoretically possible to speed-up selectors passed in replicator to use indexes? I have the same issue as @redgeoff posted

[GitHub] evsukov89 commented on issue #831: Filter _changes by key to speed up replication

2018-02-05 Thread GitBox
evsukov89 commented on issue #831: Filter _changes by key to speed up replication URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/831#issuecomment-363205174 @nickva is theoretically possible to speed-up selectors passed in replicator to use indexes? I have the same issue as @redgeoff posted