[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-7673) Remove synchronized methods of groovy.sql.Sql and document it as not thread-safe

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15035429#comment-15035429 ] Paul King edited comment on GROOVY-7673 at 12/2/15 7:56 AM: I

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-7673) Remove synchronized methods of groovy.sql.Sql and document it as not thread-safe

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15035429#comment-15035429 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-7673: --- I am not sure it is good practice to have such a b

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-7698) @CompileStatic safe-navigation issue with java property setters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15035032#comment-15035032 ] Leonard Brünings commented on GROOVY-7698: -- That was quick :) Should I update th

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-7698) @CompileStatic safe-navigation issue with java property setters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034959#comment-15034959 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-7698: GitHub user shils opened a pull request:

[GitHub] groovy pull request: GROOVY-7698 Safe navigation is broken for pro...

GitHub user shils opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/201 GROOVY-7698 Safe navigation is broken for property style non-syntheti… …c setter calls under static compilation You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull ht

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-7698) @CompileStatic safe-navigation issue with java property setters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15034883#comment-15034883 ] Shil Sinha commented on GROOVY-7698: This doesn't appear to be a case of java vs. gro