[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-8724) Groovy static methods with dots causes compilation error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Markov Alexey updated GROOVY-8724: -- Affects Version/s: 2.5.2 > Groovy static methods with dots causes compilation error >

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8659) Base class has final getter; extending class has property of same name; no warning for final override

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16582109#comment-16582109 ] Jochen Theodorou commented on GROOVY-8659: -- I think we should change the logic for the getter

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8669) Groovy class does not compile if the ValueType of an annotation is not on the classpath

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16582030#comment-16582030 ] Andreas Turban commented on GROOVY-8669: Danke für Ihre E-Mail. Ich bin bis einschließlich

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8669) Groovy class does not compile if the ValueType of an annotation is not on the classpath

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16582028#comment-16582028 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-8669: --- I agree with your assessment. > Groovy class does not compile if

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-8669) Groovy class does not compile if the ValueType of an annotation is not on the classpath

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul King updated GROOVY-8669: -- Description: If a groovy class (Test.groovy) references a class (AnnotatedClass) which has an

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8659) Base class has final getter; extending class has property of same name; no warning for final override

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16582026#comment-16582026 ] Paul King commented on GROOVY-8659: --- The current rule is: For a property (field-like declaration