[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Vladimir Sitnikov updated GROOVY-11105: --------------------------------------- Summary: Support jdk-release option for configuring the target JDK release for @CompileStatic compilations (was: Support jdk-release option for configuring the target JDK release when doing the compilation) > Support jdk-release option for configuring the target JDK release for > @CompileStatic compilations > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GROOVY-11105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11105 > Project: Groovy > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Compiler > Reporter: Vladimir Sitnikov > Priority: Major > > See the motivation and description in Kotlin: > [https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-29974/Add-a-compiler-option-Xjdk-release-similar-to-javacs-release-to-control-the-target-JDK-version] > > Sample code that requires {{jdk-release}} option for a proper compilation, > and it could not be solved with "target bytecode version" alone. > {code:java} > @groovy.transform.CompileStatic test() { > def bb = java.nio.ByteBuffer.wrap(new byte[8]) > // it should compile to invokevirtual Buffer.flip()Ljava.nio.Buffer; > // when compiling for Java 1.8 since Java 1.8 does not have ByteBuffer > flip() override in ByteBuffer > // However, if the build uses JDK17 for execution, then it contains > ByteBuffer flip() override, > // and Groovy would compile it to invokevirtual > ByteBuffer.flip()Ljava.nio.ByteBuffer > // which would fail to execute in Java 1.8 > bb.flip() > } > test() > {code} > See https://www.morling.dev/blog/bytebuffer-and-the-dreaded-nosuchmethoderror/ > See https://stackoverflow.com/a/61267496/1261287 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)