[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-11311) Groovy Closure not retaining param annotations, but only for the default single object param case

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17820629#comment-17820629 ] Jochen Theodorou commented on GROOVY-11311: --- >From a dynamic Groovy only perspective the call

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-11311) Groovy Closure not retaining param annotations, but only for the default single object param case

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17820498#comment-17820498 ] Eric Milles commented on GROOVY-11311: -- There is no {{call}} method generated for the case of one

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-11311) Groovy Closure not retaining param annotations, but only for the default single object param case

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17820495#comment-17820495 ] Eric Milles commented on GROOVY-11311: -- When a closure parameter or its type is annotated, what

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-11311) Groovy Closure not retaining param annotations, but only for the default single object param case

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17817191#comment-17817191 ] Val E commented on GROOVY-11311: Heh. Thanks. So checking doCall (instead of call) works perfectly fine

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-11311) Groovy Closure not retaining param annotations, but only for the default single object param case

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17817182#comment-17817182 ] Jochen Theodorou commented on GROOVY-11311: --- I am a bit surprised because you check the call