[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17292577#comment-17292577
]
Haonan Hou commented on IOTDB-1158:
---
Hi, I just want to mention that the PR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17292275#comment-17292275
]
Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-1158:
IMO,
1. Supporting NOT NULL, NULL has its scenario.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17292267#comment-17292267
]
sunjincheng commented on IOTDB-1158:
Reopen this issue, I'd like to listen to more thoughts, such as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17289651#comment-17289651
]
sunjincheng commented on IOTDB-1158:
Update my idea: after comprehensive consideration, single value
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17286245#comment-17286245
]
sunjincheng commented on IOTDB-1158:
+1 for NaN is not equal 0.0 for double data type, the semantic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17286230#comment-17286230
]
Jialin Qiao commented on IOTDB-1158:
Hi, a double which value is NaN should be printed as NaN, so the
