Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-03-19 Thread via GitHub
chibenwa merged PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-03-19 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-2006058834 > Let's merge? We could I guess. Don't forget to conclude the decision on the mailing list ^^. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-03-19 Thread via GitHub
chibenwa commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-2005958146 Let's merge? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment.

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-03-18 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-2005678592 Green :-) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-03-03 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-1975660958 There was a minor conflict in pom.xml, so I rebased and force pushed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-23 Thread via GitHub
chibenwa commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-1961528452 Rebase needed -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment.

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-15 Thread via GitHub
jeantil commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1490687230 ## server/container/lifecycle-api/src/test/java/org/apache/james/lifecycle/api/LeakAwareTest.java: ## @@ -76,18 +73,13 @@ public static ListAppender

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-15 Thread via GitHub
jeantil commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-1945645279 thanks I'll try and review again over lunch -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-15 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-1945639458 CC @jeantil I reworked a bit the commit history and brought back the RRT data-file test. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-15 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1490570258 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ 1.3.4 4.21 4.1.101.Final -7.14.1 +7.15.0 Review Comment: > Are you

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-15 Thread via GitHub
jeantil commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1490565847 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ 1.3.4 4.21 4.1.101.Final -7.14.1 +7.15.0 Review Comment: Are you 100% sure that

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-14 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1490494180 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ 1.3.4 4.21 4.1.101.Final -7.14.1 +7.15.0 Review Comment: > only the

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
jeantil commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1481022806 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ 1.3.4 4.21 4.1.101.Final -7.14.1 +7.15.0 Review Comment: the commit comment

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
jeantil commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1481016757 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -3514,7 +3514,7 @@ -

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1480849236 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -3514,7 +3514,7 @@ -

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1480837904 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ 1.3.4 4.21 4.1.101.Final -7.14.1 +7.15.0 Review Comment: > i wouldn't

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1480837904 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ 1.3.4 4.21 4.1.101.Final -7.14.1 +7.15.0 Review Comment: > i wouldn't

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1480833691 ## mailbox/jpa/pom.xml: ## @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@ jar Apache James :: Mailbox :: JPA + Review Comment: > does it mean we need to have

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1480834101 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -3514,7 +3514,7 @@ -

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
Arsnael commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-1931127842 > well spark maybe, I saw in the other PR that it was not a great upgrade, but reverting security patches really sounds weird As said by @chibenwa, need a good rebase.

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
chibenwa commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-1930893024 > I don't understand commits >>Revert "[UPDATE] Update spark version: Jetty update" >>Revert "[UPDATE] BouncyCastle 1.70 -> 1.77 (fixes multiple minor CVEs)" >>

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
chibenwa commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1480625284 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -2962,6 +2962,21 @@ + + + +false + + +true +

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
jeantil commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-1930748074 I don't understand commits - Revert "[UPDATE] Update spark version: Jetty update" - Revert "[UPDATE] BouncyCastle 1.70 -> 1.77 (fixes multiple minor CVEs)" well spark

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
jeantil commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1480535904 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -2831,11 +2831,6 @@ mockito-core ${mockito.version} - Review Comment: hmm maybe

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
jeantil commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1480533860 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ 1.3.4 4.21 4.1.101.Final -7.14.1 +7.15.0 Review Comment: seems like a fixup!

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
jeantil commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1480529668 ## mailbox/memory/pom.xml: ## @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ ${james.groupId} james-json +test-jar Review Comment: fixup!

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
jeantil commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1480529287 ## mailbox/jpa/pom.xml: ## @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ ${james.groupId} james-json +test-jar Review Comment: fixup!

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
jeantil commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1480521828 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -2962,6 +2962,21 @@ + + + +false + + +true +

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
jeantil commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1480519018 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -3514,7 +3514,7 @@ -

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-02-06 Thread via GitHub
jeantil commented on code in PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#discussion_r1480517633 ## mailbox/jpa/pom.xml: ## @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@ jar Apache James :: Mailbox :: JPA + Review Comment: How does this behave in IDEs ? does it

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-01-31 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-1920492131 The LDAP test failures seems not related to me (green locally). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-01-30 Thread via GitHub
chibenwa commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-1917024702 > so we can fasten the JDK21-related Why need to fasten? Likely a vote on the mailing list would be a pre-requisite to a merge... > fix the broken master also)

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-01-30 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-1916650538 > Please take the time to investigate... Yes, for sure. But are you ok with investigating the unstable tests in another PR? (so we can fasten the JDK21-related work

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-01-30 Thread via GitHub
chibenwa commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-1916625103 Please take the time to investigate... -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-01-30 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-1916563049 Green. Some unstable tests failing though: https://ci-builds.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/james%2FApacheJames/detail/PR-1963/2/tests/ ```java

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-01-29 Thread via GitHub
Arsnael commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-1916171548 I'm trying to get a green build for master but I think the commits here should do the trick: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1957 Feel free to cherry-pick them

Re: [PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-01-29 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on PR #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963#issuecomment-1916163930 The failed webadmin tests, I guess it is related to current master issue. `JPARecomputeCurrentQuotasServiceTest` and `MemoryRecomputeCurrentQuotasServiceTest`

[PR] Upgrade JDK to 21 [james-project]

2024-01-29 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 opened a new pull request, #1963: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963 continuation of https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1939 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and