Re: [PR] MIME4J-326 Adopt Mime4J 0.8.11-SNAPSHOT [james-project]

2024-03-14 Thread via GitHub
chibenwa closed pull request #2073: MIME4J-326 Adopt Mime4J 0.8.11-SNAPSHOT URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/2073 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

Re: [PR] MIME4J-326 Adopt Mime4J 0.8.11-SNAPSHOT [james-project]

2024-03-14 Thread via GitHub
chibenwa commented on PR #2073: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/2073#issuecomment-1997572044 https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/2120 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL

Re: [PR] MIME4J-326 Adopt Mime4J 0.8.11-SNAPSHOT [james-project]

2024-03-05 Thread via GitHub
chibenwa commented on PR #2073: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/2073#issuecomment-1979067464 I just called a vote on this. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

Re: [PR] MIME4J-326 Adopt Mime4J 0.8.11-SNAPSHOT [james-project]

2024-03-03 Thread via GitHub
chibenwa commented on PR #2073: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/2073#issuecomment-1975768172 > Thought should never use snapshots in production code? Well we are in for a release in MIME4J ^^ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

Re: [PR] MIME4J-326 Adopt Mime4J 0.8.11-SNAPSHOT [james-project]

2024-03-03 Thread via GitHub
quantranhong1999 commented on PR #2073: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/2073#issuecomment-1975646577 > Thought should never use snapshots in production code? That could create issues if something unstable gets merged later in mime4j project no? I have no idea about