[jclouds-examples] Minor changes to compute-basics after code review (#42)

I fixed all the comments mentioned in the previous PR. https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/34 Thanks, Suriya You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/suriyapriya/jclouds-examples master Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https:

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1013](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1013/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1012](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1012/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #208](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/208/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/91#issuecomment-39396495

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #207](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/207/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/89#issuecomment-39396478

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

Reopened #91. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/91

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

> @@ -123,6 +123,18 @@ public void testCopyObject() throws Exception { > public void testList() throws Exception { >for (String regionId : regions) { > ObjectApi objectApi = api.objectApiInRegionForContainer(regionId, > containerName); > + ObjectList response = object

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

> Are you ever available in IRC? >From time to time, although recently I've been in so many meetings that I >haven't even bothered logging in. I'll certainly try to be available for the >release. Signing off now - in CET this week, and it's almost midnight ;-) --- Reply to this email directly

Re: [jclouds] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new Swift APIs (#237)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #1200](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1200/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/237#issuecomment-39388942

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1011

See

Re: [jclouds] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new Swift APIs (#237)

[jclouds-pull-requests #730](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/730/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/237#issuecomment-39388268

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

I messed something and fixing it now. @demobox Are you ever available in IRC? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/91#issuecomment-39387872

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

> jdaggett closed this 5 minutes ago Guess we're going drop this one for now..? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/91#issuecomment-39387623

Re: [jclouds] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new Swift APIs (#237)

[jclouds » jclouds #991](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/991/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/237#issuecomment

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

Closed #91. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/91

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #206](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/206/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/91

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1010](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1010/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1010

See -- GitHub pull request #91 to jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack Building remotely on s-6f27f541 in workspace

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #205](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/205/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/91

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1009

See -- GitHub pull request #91 to jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack Building remotely on s-6f27f541 in workspace

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1009](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1009/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #204](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/204/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/91

[jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

This PR is to backport the changes on master to the 1.7 branch. JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-423 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-299 You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/rackerlabs/jclouds-labs-openstack backport-1.7-swif

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1008

See -- GitHub pull request #91 to jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack Building remotely on s-7eb6ef7c in workspace

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1008](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1008/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1007](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1007/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #203](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/203/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/89#issuecomment-39383404

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

> - CDNContainer cdnContainer = api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId).get(name); > - assertNotNull(cdnContainer); > + CDNContainer container = api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId).get(name); > + assertCDNContainerNotNull(container); > + assertTrue(container.isEnabled()); > +

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

>for (String regionId : regions) { > - CDNApi cdnApi = api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId); > + assertNotNull(api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId).enable(name)); Ah, I was looking at the wrong API ;-) So `enable` returns a **Uri**, eh? Not exactly intuitive? Is this what the underlying A

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

> jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #199 SUCCESS [Happy Checkstyle](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/199/violations/)! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/89#issuecomment-3938289

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

> @@ -123,6 +123,18 @@ public void testCopyObject() throws Exception { > public void testList() throws Exception { >for (String regionId : regions) { > ObjectApi objectApi = api.objectApiInRegionForContainer(regionId, > containerName); > + ObjectList response = object

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

Just one small comment about removing the AsnycBlobStore from the example code, otherwise I think this is good to go. Many thanks, @jdaggett - much improved! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/68#issuecomment-39382321

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> > +// Access the AsyncBlobStore > +AsyncBlobStore blobStore = context.getAsyncBlobStore(); Use a (sync) BlobStore here? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/68/files#r11227173

Re: [jclouds] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new Swift APIs (#237)

> jclouds-pull-requests #729 UNSTABLE Unrelated [test failure](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/org.apache.jclouds$jclouds-compute/729/testReport/junit/org.jclouds.compute.util/ConcurrentOpenSocketFinderTest/testChecksSocketsConcurrently/), by the way --- Reply to this

Re: [jclouds] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new Swift APIs (#237)

> Can we please get this merged and backported into the 1.7.x branch? Do you want to squash this down first, or do we want two commits here? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/237#issuecomment-39381258

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport OS Neutron Extension Router (#88)

This should probably also be part of the larger neutron refactoring anyways. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/88#issuecomment-39380443

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport OS Neutron Extension Router (#88)

These changes make sense to me. However these should be addresses with separate PRs in master first (instead of modifying this PR). Agree? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/88#issuecomment-39380385

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1005

See

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #202](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/202/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/85#issuecomment-39379085

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1005](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1005/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added @Beta annotations to APIs (#90)

Closed #90. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/90

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

> @@ -80,6 +80,23 @@ > @Fallback(NullOnNotFoundOr404.class) > @Path("/") > @Nullable > + ObjectList list(); > + > + /** > +* Lists up to 10,000 objects. If we're going to list this limitation here, also suggest what to do if you need to retrieve more items? Is there a differen

Re: [jclouds-site] Extract the latest version and snapshot into site vars (#69)

> Added latest_snapshot.txt Nice...thanks, @everett-toews! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/69#issuecomment-39378416

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

Needs a live test for the head() method. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/89#issuecomment-39378402

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #201](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/201/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/85

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1004](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1004/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1004

See -- GitHub pull request #85 to jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack Building remotely on s-6f27f541 in workspace

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

> assertAuthentication(server); > assertRequest(server.takeRequest(), "PUT", > "/v1/MossoCloudFS_5bcf396e-39dd-45ff-93a1-712b9aba90a9/container-1"); > + } finally { > + server.shutdown(); > + } > + } > + > + public void testEnableFail() throws Exception {

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

>} > } > > + public void testUpdate() throws Exception { > + for (String regionId : regions) { > + // enable with a ttl > + assertNotNull(api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId).enable(name, 77)); Same... returns a URI --- Reply to this email directly or view it on G

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

> - CDNContainer cdnContainer = api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId).get(name); > - assertNotNull(cdnContainer); > + CDNContainer container = api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId).get(name); > + assertCDNContainerNotNull(container); > + assertTrue(container.isEnabled()); > +

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

>for (String regionId : regions) { > - CDNApi cdnApi = api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId); > + assertNotNull(api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId).enable(name)); > + > + CDNContainer container = api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId).get(name); > + assertCDNContainerNotNull(

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

>for (String regionId : regions) { > - CDNApi cdnApi = api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId); > + assertNotNull(api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId).enable(name)); > + > + CDNContainer container = api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId).get(name); > + assertCDNContainerNotNull(

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

>for (String regionId : regions) { > - CDNApi cdnApi = api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId); > + assertNotNull(api.cdnApiInRegion(regionId).enable(name)); No, because it returns a URI :) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

Go to http://6805d61e78699c6102a1-a91789db63c99205e869a37bc5acf6c1.r85.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/68#issuecomment-39374678

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

[jclouds-site-pull-requests #232](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/232/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/68#issuecomment-39374504

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> {% endhighlight %} > > - AsyncBlobStore > +### AsyncBlobStore API I removed it for now. Comments below. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/68/files#r11222504

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

This guide has needed some love. :) I feel that we should take the async references out completely. If its not in the docs, then new users won't accidentally start using the async interfaces. The section "Multipart Upload" should possibly move to the provider specific guide. This was just a fi

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> {% endhighlight %} > > ### Logging > > -You can now see status of aggregate blobstore commands by enabling at least > DEBUG on the log category: "jclouds.blobstore". > +You can now see status of aggregate blobstore commands by enabling at least > **DEBUG** on the log > +category `jclouds.

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> > - * *S3* According to Amazon, it is better to create or delete buckets in a > separate initialization or setup routine that you run less often. > - You are also only allowed 100 buckets per account, so be parsimonious > (frugal). > - * *Azure* You have to wait 30 seconds before recrea

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> {% endhighlight %} > > -This will give you a connection to the BlobStore, and if it is remote, it > will be SSL unless unsupported by > -the provider. Everything you access from this context will use the same > credentials and potentially the same objects. > +This will give you a connection

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> > -### limitations > -Each blobstore has its own limitations. > +Each **BlobStore** has its own limitations: Missed that one too... --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/68/files#r11222483

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> > ### Virtual Path > > -A virtual path can either be a marker file or a prefix. In either case, > they are purely used to > -give the appearance of a hierarchical structure in a flat BlobStore. > -When you perform a list at a virtual path, the blob names returned are > absolute paths. > +

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> > ### Blob > > -A blob is unstructured data that is stored in a container. > -Some blobstores call them objects, blobs, or files. You lookup blobs in a > container by a text key, which often relates > -directly to the HTTP url used to manipulate it. Blobs can be zero length or > larger,

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> > ### Folder > > -A folder is a subcontainer. It can contain blobs or other folders. The > names of items in a folder are `basenames`. > -Blob names incorporate folders via "/" - just like you would with a > "regular" file system. > +A **_folder_** is a subcontainer and can contain blobs

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> > ### Blob > > -A blob is unstructured data that is stored in a container. > -Some blobstores call them objects, blobs, or files. You lookup blobs in a > container by a text key, which often relates > -directly to the HTTP url used to manipulate it. Blobs can be zero length or > larger,

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> > -The BlobStore API requires knowledge of 3 concepts: service, container, and > blob. > -A BlobStore is a key-value store such as Amazon S3, where your account > exists, and where you can create containers. > -A container is a namespace for your data, and you can have many of them. > -Inside

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> * Unlimited scaling > * Most are billed on a usage basis > > ### Container > > -A container is a namespace for your objects. Depending on the service, the > scope can be global, account, or sub-account scoped. > -For example, in Amazon S3, containers are called buckets, and they must be

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> > ### Filesystem Provider > > -Our file system BlobStore allows you to use the same API when persisting to > disk, memory, or a remote BlobStore like Amazon S3. > +Our **_filesystem_** provider allows you to use the same API when persisting > to disk, memory, or a Same as above. --- Repl

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> > -## Supported Providers > +Please refer to the [BlobStore Supported > Providers](/guides/providers/#blobstore-providers) page for Fixed. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/68/files#r11222396

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> > ### Transient Provider > > -Our in-memory BlobStore allows you to test your storage code without > credentials or a credit card! > +Our **_in-memory_** provider allows you to test your storage code without > credentials or a credit card! If you look at the output of the site, I think it

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> > -We use the same model across the > [ComputeGuide](/documentation/userguide/compute) which allows you to > facilitate collocation of processing and data. > +Our location API helps you to portably identify a container within context, > such as Americas or Thx. Fixed. --- Reply to this ema

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> > -### Integration with non-java clients > +You have a choice of using either the **_synchronous_** or > **_asynchronous_** BlobStore API. If you choose > +to use the asynchronous API, you will benefit by gaining access to the most > efficient means to I am going to rip out the whole "Flexib

Re: [jclouds-site] Update stale BlobStore docs (#68)

> @@ -4,206 +4,242 @@ title: BlobStore Guide > permalink: /start/blobstore/ > --- > > -The BlobStore API is a portable means of managing key-value storage > providers such as Microsoft Azure Blob Service > -and Amazon S3. It offers both asynchronous and synchronous APIs, as well as > Map-base

Re: [jclouds-site] Extract the latest version and snapshot into site vars (#69)

Closed #69. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/69

Re: [jclouds-site] Extract the latest version and snapshot into site vars (#69)

Added latest_snapshot.txt Merged and deployed. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/69#issuecomment-39371163

Re: [jclouds-site] Extract the latest version and snapshot into site vars (#69)

Go to http://5d0e5843fb35537e2b64-9c5f9405e15f01736c8074c95da8bbf0.r96.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/69#issuecomment-39368661

Re: [jclouds-site] Extract the latest version and snapshot into site vars (#69)

[jclouds-site-pull-requests #231](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/231/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/69#issuecomment-39368407

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added @Beta annotations to APIs (#90)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #200](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/200/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/90#issuecomment-39365786

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added @Beta annotations to APIs (#90)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1003](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1003/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

[jclouds-labs-openstack] Added @Beta annotations to APIs (#90)

The subject says it all! Discussed this with @everett-toews and @zack-shoylev this morning and we decided to mark the APIs as beta. This needs to be merged to master and to 1.7, thanks! You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/rackerlabs/jclouds-labs-openstack

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #199](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/199/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/89#issuecomment-39364532

[jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

This PR removes the dependency on the _varargs_ for the **ObjectApi.list()** method. It also adds the **ContainerApi.head()** method to get just the Container metadata, rather than retrieving the entire object. This method is utilized to determine if a container exists or not. This will need

Re: [jclouds] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new Swift APIs (#237)

[jclouds » jclouds #990](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/990/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/237#issuecomment

Re: [jclouds] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new Swift APIs (#237)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #1199](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1199/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/237#issuecomment-39358546

Re: [jclouds] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new Swift APIs (#237)

[jclouds-pull-requests #729](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/729/) UNSTABLE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/237#issuecomment-39358086

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport OS Neutron Extension Router (#88)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1001](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1001/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport OS Neutron Extension Router (#88)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #198](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/198/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/88#issuecomment-39357748

[jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport OS Neutron Extension Router (#88)

You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/rackerlabs/jclouds-labs-openstack backport-router Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/88 -- Commit Summary -- * OS Neutron Extension Router

Re: [jclouds] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new Swift APIs (#237)

I discovered that when you organize imports (command-O) in Eclipse, if you reference a class by name in the JavaDocs it adds the import. I will make sure to run Checkstyle in Eclipse before submitting PRs in the future. @demobox Can we please get this merged and backported into the 1.7.x branc

[jira] [Resolved] (JCLOUDS-494) Glance version negotiation is not performed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Phillips resolved JCLOUDS-494. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.8.0 > Glance version negotiation is not perfor

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-494) Glance version negotiation is not performed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Phillips updated JCLOUDS-494: Attachment: JCLOUDS-494.patch > Glance version negotiation is not performed >

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] JCLOUDS-494: Change EndpointParam parser to negotiate version for Glance API (#82)

Committed to [master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-labs-openstack.git;a=commit;h=7c1b681b6699025aa56e6b64c7da9c0136349b00) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/82#issuecomment-39352640

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-494) Glance version negotiation is not performed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13957849#comment-13957849 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-494: - Commit

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] JCLOUDS-494: Change EndpointParam parser to negotiate version for Glance API (#82)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #999](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/999/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jcloud

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] JCLOUDS-494: Change EndpointParam parser to negotiate version for Glance API (#82)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #197](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/197/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/82#issuecomment-39341990

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] JCLOUDS-494: Change EndpointParam parser to negotiate version for Glance API (#82)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #196](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/196/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/82#issuecomment-39341943

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] JCLOUDS-494: Change EndpointParam parser to negotiate version for Glance API (#82)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #998](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/998/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jcloud

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] JCLOUDS-494: Change EndpointParam parser to negotiate version for Glance API (#82)

@demobox done! Thanks for the help! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/82#issuecomment-39340891

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-cli-1.7.x-branch #108

See -- Started by upstream project "jclouds-karaf-1.7.x-branch" build number 124 originally caused by: Started by user Andrew Phillips Building remotely on 016c44d2 in workspace

Jenkins build is still unstable: jclouds-1.7.x-branch #60

See

  1   2   >