Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport checkstyle fixes (#92)

merged. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/92#issuecomment-39527791

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport checkstyle fixes (#92)

Closed #92. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/92

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport checkstyle fixes (#92)

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/220/violations/ --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/92#issuecomment-39527338

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Better explanation of Beta APIs (#93)

+1 - looks good to me. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/93#issuecomment-39526647

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-cli-1.7.x-branch #109

See

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport checkstyle fixes (#92)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #220](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/220/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/92#issuecomment-39524494

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport checkstyle fixes (#92)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1031](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1031/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-labs-1.7.x-branch #37

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-labs-1.7.x-branch » jclouds vcloud-director api #37

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-labs-openstack-1.7.x-branch » jclouds openstack-swift api #48

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-labs-openstack-1.7.x-branch #48

See

Jenkins build is unstable: jclouds #2570

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-1.7.x-branch #62

See

Jenkins build became unstable: jclouds » jclouds compute core #2570

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds » jclouds blobstore core #2570

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-1.7.x-branch » jclouds ec2 api #62

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds » jclouds #995

See

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport checkstyle fixes (#92)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1030](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1030/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport checkstyle fixes (#92)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #219](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/219/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/92#issuecomment-39518715

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport checkstyle fixes (#92)

Had to rebase and add some missing fixes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/92#issuecomment-39518263

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-1.7.x-branch #61

See Changes: [Everett Toews] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new APIs -- [...truncated 16774 lines...] at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48)

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds #2569

See Changes: [Everett Toews] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new APIs -- [...truncated 15553 lines...] [Unloading class sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor4] [Unloading class Gr

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs-openstack-1.7.x-branch » jclouds openstack-swift api #47

See Changes: [Everett Toews] Added ObjectApi.list() and ContainerApi.head() methods/tests -- [...truncated 256 lines...] Apr 3, 2

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs-openstack-1.7.x-branch #47

See Changes: [Everett Toews] Added ObjectApi.list() and ContainerApi.head() methods/tests -- [...truncated 1156 lines...] [INFO] Building jar:

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds blobstore core #2569

See -- [...truncated 597 lines...] [WARNING]

Jenkins build is back to stable : jclouds-1.7.x-branch » jclouds compute core #61

See

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs-openstack #324

See Changes: [Everett Toews] Added ObjectApi.list() and ContainerApi.head() methods/tests -- [...truncated 3392 lines...] [WARNING]

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs-openstack » jclouds openstack-swift api #324

See -- [...truncated 294 lines...] INFO: Received request: DELETE /v1/MossoCloudFS_5bcf396e-39dd-45ff-93a1-712b9aba90a9/myContainer HTTP/1.1 and res

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

Merged to master and 1.7.x --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/89#issuecomment-39516488

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

Closed #89. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/89

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-317) OpenStack Nova v2.0 Domain Server Status missing from OpenStack API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Everett Toews updated JCLOUDS-317: -- Fix Version/s: 1.7.2 1.8.0 > OpenStack Nova v2.0 Domain Server Status missi

[jira] [Closed] (JCLOUDS-317) OpenStack Nova v2.0 Domain Server Status missing from OpenStack API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Everett Toews closed JCLOUDS-317. - Resolution: Fixed > OpenStack Nova v2.0 Domain Server Status missing from OpenStack API > --

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-317) OpenStack Nova v2.0 Domain Server Status missing from OpenStack API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959402#comment-13959402 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-317: - Commit

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-317: Add missing states to Nova v2 Server (#334)

Closed #334. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/334

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-317: Add missing states to Nova v2 Server (#334)

Squashed and merged to master and 1.7.x --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/334#issuecomment-39516000

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-317) OpenStack Nova v2.0 Domain Server Status missing from OpenStack API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959401#comment-13959401 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-317: - Commit

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

@nacx Great! If we are good to go, then I can add those changes to a new PR post-1.7.2 . I just made a note to remind me about updating the test. :) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/89#issuecomment-39515652

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport checkstyle fixes (#92)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1027](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1027/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport checkstyle fixes (#92)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #218](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/218/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/92#issuecomment-39515207

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

Thanks for the cleanup. I'm OK to change that post 1.7.2 as that behavior was already there and was not the purpose of this PR. It would be better addressed in a new one. Regarding the test that throws the exception and reading it again (my apologies for not having suggested this before), I thi

Re: [jclouds] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new Swift APIs (#237)

Closed #237. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/237

Re: [jclouds] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new Swift APIs (#237)

Merged to master and 1.7.x --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/237#issuecomment-39514924

Re: [jclouds] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new Swift APIs (#237)

@ntolia By definition a HP custom TempURL implementation wouldn't belong in any Swift API. It should be in the HP provider. I've contacted someone at HP to see if they'll be able to dedicate someone to jclouds. It sounds like they are and hopefully we'll know more next week. --- Reply to this e

Re: [jclouds] Add deprecation warnings and provide links to new Swift APIs (#237)

I did better Beta documentation in https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/93 --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/237#issuecomment-39514233

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Better explanation of Beta APIs (#93)

Merged to master and 1.7.x --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/93#issuecomment-39514158

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Better explanation of Beta APIs (#93)

Closed #93. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/93

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Better explanation of Beta APIs (#93)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1025](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1025/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Better explanation of Beta APIs (#93)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #217](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/217/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/93#issuecomment-39513328

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Better explanation of Beta APIs (#93)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1024](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1024/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Better explanation of Beta APIs (#93)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #216](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/216/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/93#issuecomment-39512813

[jclouds-labs-openstack] Better explanation of Beta APIs (#93)

You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/rackerlabs/jclouds-labs-openstack beta-explanation Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/93 -- Commit Summary -- * Better explanation of Beta A

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1022](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1022/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

Closed #85. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/85

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

Merged to master and 1.7.x --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/85#issuecomment-39509178

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1021](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1021/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

@nacx Do you agree with the state of this PR. Are we good to merge? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/89#issuecomment-39508020

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

> + assertEquals(container.getName(), "myContainer"); > + assertEquals(container.getObjectCount(), 42l); > + assertEquals(container.getBytesUsed(), 323479l); > + for (Entry entry : > container.getMetadata().entrySet()) { > + > assertEquals(container.getM

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

> @@ -80,6 +80,23 @@ > @Fallback(NullOnNotFoundOr404.class) > @Path("/") > @Nullable > + ObjectList list(); > + > + /** > +* Lists up to 10,000 objects. > +* > +* @param options > +* the {@link ListContainerOptions} for controlling the > returned list.

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #215](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/215/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/89#issuecomment-39507714

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport checkstyle fixes (#92)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1019](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1019/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Added missing methods to Container and Object APIs (#89)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #214](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/214/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/89#issuecomment-39506929

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1018](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1018/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport checkstyle fixes (#92)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #213](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/213/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/92#issuecomment-39506567

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Updates to Rackspace Cloud Files CDN (#85)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #212](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/212/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/85#issuecomment-39506059

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport checkstyle fixes (#92)

There were two separate PRs to fix checkstyle problems in master. The second also fixed code that is not in 1.7.x so it had to be resolved. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/92#issuecomment-39505835

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-317: Add missing states to Nova v2 Server (#334)

[jclouds » jclouds #993](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/993/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/334#issuecomment

[jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport checkstyle fixes (#92)

You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/rackerlabs/jclouds-labs-openstack backport-checkstyle-fixes Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/92 -- Commit Summary -- * Fixes checkstyle v

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs-openstack-1.7.x-branch #43

See Changes: [Everett Toews] Backport of OpenStack Swift/Rackspace Cloud Files as described in JCLOUDS-299 and JCLOUDS-423 -- [...truncated 5607 lines...] Uploaded: ht

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport OS Neutron Extension Router (#88)

merged --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/88#issuecomment-39504664

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport OS Neutron Extension Router (#88)

Closed #88. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/88

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

Closed #91. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/91

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Backport openstack-swift and rackspace-cloudfiles to 1.7 (#91)

LDAP is back. Merged. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/91#issuecomment-39503775

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-299) Multi-Region Support for BlobStore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959202#comment-13959202 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-299: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-423) Implement Rackspace Cloud Files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959203#comment-13959203 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-423: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-487) Return ordered IP addresses from server details

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959185#comment-13959185 ] Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-487: -- Alright, here is some neutron code that can

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (JCLOUDS-487) Return ordered IP addresses from server details

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Zack Shoylev updated JCLOUDS-487: - Comment: was deleted (was: Also the mapped ips are available as documented here: http://docs.op

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-317: Add missing states to Nova v2 Server (#334)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #1202](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1202/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/334#issuecomment-39501469

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-317: Add missing states to Nova v2 Server (#334)

[jclouds-pull-requests #732](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/732/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/334#issuecomment-39501372

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-503 - Missing c3.large from AWSEC2HardwareSupplier (#337)

[jclouds » jclouds #992](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/992/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/337#issuecomment

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-503 - Missing c3.large from AWSEC2HardwareSupplier (#337)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #1201](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1201/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/337#issuecomment-39499619

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-503 - Missing c3.large from AWSEC2HardwareSupplier (#337)

[jclouds-pull-requests #731](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/731/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/337#issuecomment-39499024

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-317: Add missing states to Nova v2 Server (#334)

I think I have addressed the issues pointed out during review. I must say that the lines in the serialization test are still quite long, the only solution I see is to change the real UUIDs to fake UUIDs (like 1234) as it is done in other tests. However I thought that the fact of using real paylo

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-503) Missing c3.large from AWSEC2HardwareSupplier

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959120#comment-13959120 ] Matheus Cunha commented on JCLOUDS-503: --- Hi guys, I have submitted a pull request,

[jclouds] JCLOUDS-503 - Missing c3.large from AWSEC2HardwareSupplier (#337)

When a NodeMetadata object represents an instance type c3.large, the hardware id is null. This failure occurs because the AWSEC2HardwareSupplier has no reference to the method org.jclouds.ec2.compute.domain.EC2HardwareBuilder.c3_large. You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull htt

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-500] Initial commit for docker (#57)

> + NodeMetadataBuilder builder = new NodeMetadataBuilder(); > + builder.id(container.getId()) > + .name(name).group(group) > + .hostname(container.getConfig().getHostname()); > + // TODO Set up location properly and hardware > + LocationBuilder locatio

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-500] Initial commit for docker (#57)

> +import java.util.Map; > + > +import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull; > +import static com.google.common.collect.Iterables.getOnlyElement; > + > +/** > + * @author Andrea Turli > + */ > +@Singleton > +public class ContainerToNodeMetadata implements Function NodeMetadata>

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCLOUDS-486) Be able to use neutron to statically assign IPs to private interface at boot time in nova

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959076#comment-13959076 ] Zack Shoylev edited comment on JCLOUDS-486 at 4/3/14 6:45 PM: -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCLOUDS-486) Be able to use neutron to statically assign IPs to private interface at boot time in nova

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959076#comment-13959076 ] Zack Shoylev edited comment on JCLOUDS-486 at 4/3/14 6:43 PM: -

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-486) Be able to use neutron to statically assign IPs to private interface at boot time in nova

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959076#comment-13959076 ] Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-486: -- ServerApi serverApi = api.getServerApiForZon

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-500] Initial commit for docker (#57)

> +import java.io.File; > +import java.io.FileInputStream; > +import java.io.FileOutputStream; > +import java.io.IOException; > + > +import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkArgument; > +import static com.google.common.collect.Iterables.getLast; > + > +/** > + * @author Andrea Turli

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-500] Initial commit for docker (#57)

> +*/ > + @Named("images:list") > + @GET > + @Path("/images/json") > + @Fallback(Fallbacks.EmptySetOnNotFoundOr404.class) > + Set listImages(ListImageOptions options); > + > + /** > +* Inspect an image > +* > +* @param imageId The id of the image to inspect. > +* @re

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-500] Initial commit for docker (#57)

> + @Named("version") > + @GET > + @Path("/version") > + Version getVersion(); > + > + /** > +* List all running containers > +* > +* @param options the options to list the containers (@see > ListContainerOptions) > +* @return a set of containers > +*/ > + @Named("c

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-500] Initial commit for docker (#57)

> + > +/** > + * Docker implementation of {@link > org.jclouds.compute.extensions.ImageExtension} > + * > + * @author Andrea Turli > + */ > +@Singleton > +public class DockerImageExtension implements ImageExtension { > + > + @Resource > + @Named(ComputeServiceConstants.COMPUTE_LOGGER) > + pr

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-500] Initial commit for docker (#57)

> + checkArgument(checkNotNull(input, "input") instanceof File, "this > binder is only valid for File!"); > + checkNotNull(request, "request"); > + > + File dockerFile = (File) input; > + File tmpDir = Files.createTempDir(); > + final File targetFile = new File(tmpDir + Fi

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-500] Initial commit for docker (#57)

> + } > + > + public DockerApiMetadata() { > + this(new Builder()); > + } > + > + protected DockerApiMetadata(Builder builder) { > + super(builder); > + } > + > + public static Properties defaultProperties() { > + Properties properties = BaseHttpApiMetadata.defaultPropert

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-500] Initial commit for docker (#57)

> + > +import java.io.Closeable; > + > +/** > + * Provides synchronous access to Docker. > + * > + * @author Andrea Turli > + * @see href="http://docs.docker.io/en/latest/api/docker_remote_api_v1.8/#docker-remote-api-v1-8";> > + */ > +public interface DockerApi extends Closeable { > + > + /** >

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-500] Initial commit for docker (#57)

> + > + > +org.apache.maven.plugins > +maven-surefire-plugin > + > + > +integration > +integration-test > + > + test > + > + > +

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-500] Initial commit for docker (#57)

> + > +--> > +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; > + xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 > http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";> > + 4.0.0 > + > +org.apache.jclouds.labs > +jclouds-labs > +1.8

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-500] Initial commit for docker (#57)

> + > +org.apache.jclouds.labs > +jclouds-labs > +1.8.0-SNAPSHOT > + > + > + > + org.apache.jclouds.labs > + docker > + jclouds docker API > + ComputeService binding to the Docker v1.8 API > + bundle > + > + > +https://localhost:4243 > +1.8 Align this property with

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-486) Be able to use neutron to statically assign IPs to private interface at boot time in nova

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13958936#comment-13958936 ] Everett Toews commented on JCLOUDS-486: --- Can we get some sample code on exactly how

  1   2   >