[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-595) Investigate removing default content type

Andrew Gaul created JCLOUDS-595: --- Summary: Investigate removing default content type Key: JCLOUDS-595 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-595 Project: jclouds Issue Type: Improve

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-595) Investigate removing default content type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-595: Description: Presently {{ContentMetadataBuilder.contentType}} defaults to "application/unknown".

Re: [jclouds-site] Testing...do not merge (#108)

[jclouds-site-pull-requests #345](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/345/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/108#issuecomment-45817442

Re: [jclouds-site] Testing...do not merge (#108)

Reopened #108. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/108#event-130514549

Re: [jclouds-site] Testing...do not merge (#108)

[jclouds-site-pull-requests #344](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/344/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/108#issuecomment-45814746

Re: [jclouds-site] Testing...do not merge (#108)

Closed #108. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/108#event-130505131

Re: [jclouds-site] Testing...do not merge (#108)

Reopened #108. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/108#event-130505149

Re: [jclouds] Enhancements to availability zones api - JCLOUDS-582 (#392)

@zack-shoylev Yes, it would break any user code that was calling getAvailabilityZoneApi() directly due to the new Optional, but I think the optional is more correct. I think the extension APIs need a good review in general for this kind of thing. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on

Re: [jclouds-site] Testing...do not merge (#108)

[jclouds-site-pull-requests #343](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/343/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/108#issuecomment-45814347

Re: [jclouds-site] Testing...do not merge (#108)

Closed #108. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/108#event-130503795

Re: [jclouds-site] Testing...do not merge (#108)

[jclouds-site-pull-requests #342](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/342/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/108#issuecomment-45813261

Re: [jclouds-site] Testing...do not merge (#108)

Closed #108. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/108#event-130499968

Re: [jclouds-site] Testing...do not merge (#108)

Reopened #108. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/108#event-130499976

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds » jclouds Amazon Elastic Load Balancer provider #2631

See

Jenkins build became unstable: jclouds » jclouds #1214

See

[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-594) ComputeService.suspendNodesMatching throwing UnsupportedOperationException but call still succeeds

Christopher Dancy created JCLOUDS-594: - Summary: ComputeService.suspendNodesMatching throwing UnsupportedOperationException but call still succeeds Key: JCLOUDS-594 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/J

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds #2630

See Changes: [Andrew Phillips] Pretty formatted json test resources -- [...truncated 27713 lines...] [JENKINS] Archiving

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds » jclouds openstack-cinder api #2630

See

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds Amazon Elastic Load Balancer provider #2630

See -- [INFO] [INFO] ---

Re: [jclouds] Factored out some constants (#402)

[jclouds » jclouds #1212](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1212/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/402#issuecomme

Re: [jclouds] Factored out some constants (#402)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #1349](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1349/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/402#issuecomment-45793082

Re: [jclouds] Factored out some constants (#402)

[jclouds-pull-requests #878](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/878/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/402#issuecomment-45793039

Re: [jclouds] Factored out some constants (#402)

@demobox has a point about some possible confusion in the javadocs. More info would be good. Thanks! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/402#issuecomment-45790324

Re: [jclouds] Improve Expect Test readability (#397)

+1 --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/397#issuecomment-45790429

Re: [jclouds] Pretty Format JSON (#398)

@demobox Thx, I was about to do this myself. Much appreciated! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/398#issuecomment-45789982

Re: [jclouds] Pretty Format JSON (#398)

> jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #1336 UNSTABLE I can't see that build any more, but I'm pretty sure it's something unrelated. [Merged](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;a=commit;h=a6c89d9150cc4464515e2108712d4cd8d55f614b) to master. Thanks, @jdaggett! --- Reply to this email

Re: [jclouds] Pretty Format JSON (#398)

Closed #398. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/398#event-130415607

Re: [jclouds] Enhancements to availability zones api - JCLOUDS-582 (#392)

This breaks backwards compatibility, correct? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/392#issuecomment-45789421

Re: [jclouds] Factored out some constants (#402)

@everett-toews Awesome! I have been meaning on refactoring these into the `BlobStoreContants` class. I believe that they would be more appropriate there, rather than in the core `Constants` class. cc @andrewgaul @shri --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

Re: [jclouds] Factored out some constants (#402)

Pending PR builders, this change looks +1 - good to go for me. Just curious about the meaning of some of those properties, actually. Thanks, @everett-toews! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/402#issuecomment-45788690

Re: [jclouds] Factored out some constants (#402)

> +* The magnitude of object parts being uploaded in parallel. > +*/ > + public static final String PROPERTY_MPU_PARTS_MAGNITUDE = > "jclouds.mpu.parts.magnitude"; > + > + /** > +* The number of object parts being uploaded in parallel. > +*/ > + public static final String PRO

Re: [jclouds] Factored out some constants (#402)

> @@ -303,6 +303,31 @@ > */ > public static final String PROPERTY_MAX_PARALLEL_DELETES = > "jclouds.max-parallel-deletes"; > > + /** > +* The size (in bytes) of object parts being uploaded in parallel. > +*/ > + public static final String PROPERTY_MPU_PARTS_SIZE = > "jcloud

[jclouds] Factored out some constants (#402)

You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/rackspace/jclouds factored-out-constants Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/402 -- Commit Summary -- * Factored out some constants -- File Changes --

Re: [jclouds] Pretty Format JSON (#398)

Looks good, please merge. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/398#issuecomment-45784955

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-588: Register discovered images in the image cache (#401)

>// see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-570 >Optional image = tryFind(images, idPredicate); > - if (!image.isPresent()) { > - logger.warn("Image %s not found in the image cache. Trying to get > it directly...", imageId); > - // Note that this migh

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-588: Register discovered images in the image cache (#401)

>// see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-570 >Optional image = tryFind(images, idPredicate); > - if (!image.isPresent()) { > - logger.warn("Image %s not found in the image cache. Trying to get > it directly...", imageId); > - // Note that this migh

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-588: Register discovered images in the image cache (#401)

>// see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-570 >Optional image = tryFind(images, idPredicate); > - if (!image.isPresent()) { > - logger.warn("Image %s not found in the image cache. Trying to get > it directly...", imageId); > - // Note that this migh

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-588: Register discovered images in the image cache (#401)

[jclouds » jclouds #1211](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1211/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/401#issuecomme

Jenkins build is back to stable : jclouds » jclouds #1211

See

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-588: Register discovered images in the image cache (#401)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #1348](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1348/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/401#issuecomment-45738418

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-588: Register discovered images in the image cache (#401)

[jclouds-pull-requests #877](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/877/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/401#issuecomment-45738254

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-588) Exception creating node rackspace with unlisted image

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14027699#comment-14027699 ] Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-588: Patch available for review: https://gith

[jclouds] JCLOUDS-588: Register discovered images in the image cache (#401)

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-588 Images were cached in memory using a memoized supplier. To allow growing this cache with the discovered images, the `ImageCacheSupplier` class has been created. It provides an in-memory cache with all discovered images and acts as a view over th

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-512) Cannot start instance from newly created image in ComputeService

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-512: --- Description: A user found that after they create an image, they cannot start an instance of

[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-593) cloudstack-1.7.3 jar has no feature called Volume Resize

vishnu created JCLOUDS-593: -- Summary: cloudstack-1.7.3 jar has no feature called Volume Resize Key: JCLOUDS-593 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-593 Project: jclouds Issue Type: Bu