Re: [jclouds-site] Initial strawman for the 1.8.1 release notes (#138)

> +* [openstack-swift API changes from 1.8.0 to > 1.8.1](api-changes/openstack-swift/) > + > +## Known Issues > + > +## Credits > + > +jclouds would like to thank everyone who contributed time and effort in > order to make this release happen: > + > +* Apache jclouds > [PMC](http://people.apache

Re: [jclouds-site] Initial strawman for the 1.8.1 release notes (#138)

Go to http://f864ab384a031a3a42ff-7621ac03bcc980806fdaede83f69cfa7.r71.cf5.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/138#issuecomment-60349836

Re: [jclouds-site] Initial strawman for the 1.8.1 release notes (#138)

[jclouds-site-pull-requests #424](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/424/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/138#issuecomment-60349761

Re: [jclouds-karaf] Updating jsch.agentproxy 0.0.7 -> 0.0.8 (#55)

Backported to [1.8.x](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-karaf.git;a=commit;h=4ff123910d7060ebc8723d23f95998e802883d5d) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/55#issuecomment-60348615

Re: [jclouds] Updating jsch.agentproxy 0.0.7 -> 0.0.8 (#533)

Backported to [1.8.x](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;a=commit;h=7db3d33ea36b5007f4f40bde96bb6448f0f47f06) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/533#issuecomment-60348651

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#560)

Closed #560. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/560#event-183125467

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#560)

Committed to [1.8.x](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;a=commit;h=dcfda5217b39d897e6e8ff975233318ccfbf6cdf) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/560#issuecomment-60348037

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#581)

> +import static org.testng.Assert.assertTrue; > + > +@Test(groups = "live", testName = "AvailabilityZoneApiLiveTest", > singleThreaded = true) > +public class AvailabilityZoneApiLiveTest extends BaseCinderApiLiveTest { > + > + private AvailabilityZoneApi availabilityZoneApi; > + > + public Av

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#581)

thanks @demobox :) and @jdaggett and @adriancole and god knows who else was on the original PR :) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/581#issuecomment-60347554

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#581)

Merged to [master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;a=commit;h=1205010cfa40363c403aa2c1b88271774b3f1d04). Uff. We got there! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/581#issuecomment-60347245

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] openstack glance added option copy from to create image (#162)

Closed #162. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/162#event-183119804

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] openstack glance added option copy from to create image (#162)

Committed to [1.8.x](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-labs-openstack.git;a=commit;h=c82fbd1698b085ba4cfe5a4e3af9cc960b12cd74). Thanks, @inbarsto! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/162#issuecomment-603463

Re: [jclouds] added tenantId/projectId to volume and snapshot (#562)

> + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, > + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. > + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and > + * limitations under the License. > + */ > + > +package org.jclouds.ope

Re: [jclouds] added tenantId/projectId to volume and snapshot (#562)

> @@ -231,11 +237,11 @@ public static Volume forId(String volumeId) { > @Named("display_description") > private final String description; > private final Map metadata; Ah, OK. Thanks for explaining, @nacx! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclou

Re: [jclouds] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#583)

[jclouds » jclouds #1837](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1837/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/583#issuecomme

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-757 Drop FCGP labs provider (#98)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs #1762](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1762/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pul

Re: [jclouds] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#583)

[jclouds-pull-requests #1325](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1325/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/583#issuecomment-60343398

Re: [jclouds-labs] Update to latest Azure Compute api version and fix OS Image api (#96)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs #1761](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1761/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pul

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-757 Drop FCGP labs provider (#98)

[jclouds-labs-pull-requests #344](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/344/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/98#issuecomment-60343062

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCLOUDS-753) Investigate HttpCommandExecutorService(s) with regards to POODLE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182414#comment-14182414 ] Adrian Cole edited comment on JCLOUDS-753 at 10/24/14 4:15 AM:

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-753) Investigate HttpCommandExecutorService(s) with regards to POODLE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182414#comment-14182414 ] Adrian Cole commented on JCLOUDS-753: - FYI: dropping fgcp in JCLOUD-757 leaves us wit

[jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-757 Drop FCGP labs provider (#98)

This removes 1 of 2 users of non-default SSLContext You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/adriancole/jclouds-labs adrian.no-fgcp Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/98 -- Commit Summary -- *

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-757) Drop FCGP labs provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182413#comment-14182413 ] Adrian Cole commented on JCLOUDS-757: - https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/9

Re: [jclouds-labs] Update to latest Azure Compute api version and fix OS Image api (#96)

[jclouds-labs-pull-requests #343](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/343/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/96#issuecomment-60342697

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-757) Drop FCGP labs provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182411#comment-14182411 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-757: - Commit

Re: [jclouds-labs] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#97)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs #1760](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1760/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pul

[jira] [Assigned] (JCLOUDS-757) Drop FCGP labs provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrian Cole reassigned JCLOUDS-757: --- Assignee: Adrian Cole > Drop FCGP labs provider > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-757) Drop FCGP labs provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182410#comment-14182410 ] Adrian Cole commented on JCLOUDS-757: - Thanks so much [~dkoper]. Always welcome here

Re: [jclouds-labs] Update to latest Azure Compute api version and fix OS Image api (#96)

Closed #96. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/96#event-183105475

Re: [jclouds-labs] Update to latest Azure Compute api version and fix OS Image api (#96)

cherry-picked into master. I have probably >10 commits to port to 1.8.x (earlier ones conflict due to JCLOUDS-653). I'll get those in before adding more. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/96#issuecomment-60342538

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-757) Drop FCGP labs provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182409#comment-14182409 ] Dies Koper commented on JCLOUDS-757: Thank you for reaching out to me. I didn't real

Re: [jclouds-labs] Update to latest Azure Compute api version and fix OS Image api (#96)

> @@ -80,7 +81,12 @@ private void resetState() { >} else if (qName.equals("Category")) { > category = currentOrNull(currentText); >} else if (qName.equals("Location")) { > - location = currentOrNull(currentText); > + String locationField = currentOrNull(cur

Re: [jclouds-labs] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#97)

[jclouds-labs-pull-requests #342](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/342/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/97#issuecomment-60342137

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCLOUDS-653) Upgrade to Guava 18

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182402#comment-14182402 ] Adrian Cole edited comment on JCLOUDS-653 at 10/24/14 3:58 AM:

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-653) Upgrade to Guava 18

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182402#comment-14182402 ] Adrian Cole commented on JCLOUDS-653: - [~andrewp] FYI I have corrected all the module

Re: [jclouds] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#583)

[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6 #236](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/236/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/583#issuecomment-60341945

[jclouds] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#583)

This reverts commit 95cfc0d950861e5bc753ee3b0669aa5c59c217e8. Many conflicts due to duration between above commit and now See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653 for more details You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/adriancole/jclouds adrian.no-

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCLOUDS-653) Upgrade to Guava 18

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182357#comment-14182357 ] Adrian Cole edited comment on JCLOUDS-653 at 10/24/14 3:54 AM:

Re: [jclouds-labs] Update to latest Azure Compute api version and fix OS Image api (#96)

+1 - looks good to me. One minor comment that can also be ignored. Thanks, @adriancole! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/96#issuecomment-60341256

Re: [jclouds-labs] Update to latest Azure Compute api version and fix OS Image api (#96)

> @@ -80,7 +81,12 @@ private void resetState() { >} else if (qName.equals("Category")) { > category = currentOrNull(currentText); >} else if (qName.equals("Location")) { > - location = currentOrNull(currentText); > + String locationField = currentOrNull(cur

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#164)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1886](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1886/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclo

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-653) Upgrade to Guava 18

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182382#comment-14182382 ] Adrian Cole commented on JCLOUDS-653: - Note it seems also newDirectExecutorService wa

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-cli-1.8.x-branch #32

See

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#164)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #467](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/467/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/164#issuecomment-60340672

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCLOUDS-653) Upgrade to Guava 18

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182357#comment-14182357 ] Adrian Cole edited comment on JCLOUDS-653 at 10/24/14 3:27 AM:

[jclouds-labs-openstack] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#164)

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653 for details. You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/adriancole/jclouds-labs-openstack adrian.no-floor-guava18 Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCLOUDS-653) Upgrade to Guava 18

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182357#comment-14182357 ] Adrian Cole edited comment on JCLOUDS-653 at 10/24/14 3:25 AM:

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#63)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-google #1522](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1522/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jc

Re: [jclouds-labs-aws] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#61)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-aws #1505](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-aws/1505/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#63)

[jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests #174](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests/174/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/63#issuecomment-60339822

[jclouds-labs-google] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#63)

This reverts commit e2e288ee86d537d249c7e58c782a66b0201f2134. Many conflicts on account of lots of changes since the original commit. see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653 for details You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/adriancole/jclouds-lab

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCLOUDS-653) Upgrade to Guava 18

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182357#comment-14182357 ] Adrian Cole edited comment on JCLOUDS-653 at 10/24/14 3:13 AM:

Re: [jclouds-labs-aws] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#61)

[jclouds-labs-aws-pull-requests #128](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-aws-pull-requests/128/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-aws/pull/61#issuecomment-60339549

Re: [jclouds-labs-aws] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#61)

Reopened #61. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-aws/pull/61#event-183093489

Re: [jclouds-labs-aws] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#61)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-aws #1504](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-aws/1504/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-

Re: [jclouds-labs] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#97)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs #1759](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1759/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pul

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCLOUDS-653) Upgrade to Guava 18

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182357#comment-14182357 ] Adrian Cole edited comment on JCLOUDS-653 at 10/24/14 2:58 AM:

Re: [jclouds-labs-aws] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#61)

[jclouds-labs-aws-pull-requests #127](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-aws-pull-requests/127/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-aws/pull/61#issuecomment-6033

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCLOUDS-653) Upgrade to Guava 18

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182357#comment-14182357 ] Adrian Cole edited comment on JCLOUDS-653 at 10/24/14 2:56 AM:

[jclouds-labs-aws] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#61)

This reverts commit 710a7784eae58129a7796ac06c5e7b1d231ab4cf. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653 for details. You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/adriancole/jclouds-labs-aws adrian.no-floor-guava18 Or you can view, comment on it, or merge

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-653) Upgrade to Guava 18

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182357#comment-14182357 ] Adrian Cole commented on JCLOUDS-653: - https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/9

[jira] [Reopened] (JCLOUDS-653) Upgrade to Guava 18

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrian Cole reopened JCLOUDS-653: - Assignee: Adrian Cole (was: Andrew Gaul) The implementation of this changed caused jclouds on

Re: [jclouds-labs] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#97)

[jclouds-labs-pull-requests #341](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/341/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/97#issuecomment-60338434

Re: [jclouds-labs] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#97)

Actually, so far, we can correct these in child modules first. At least here, it only requires decoupling subtypes of TemplateOptions from MoreObjects.ToStringHelper (by not overriding `string()`). Once we merge this and similar from the other labs, (and any other knock-ons in karaf or cli), we

Re: [jclouds-labs] Update to latest Azure Compute api version and fix OS Image api (#96)

CommitThenReview in T-1Day --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/96#issuecomment-60337488

Re: [jclouds-site] Initial strawman for the 1.8.1 release notes (#138)

> +If you are concerned about secure connections, it is almost never a good > idea to use this option in the first place. If you absolutely need to trust > all certificates _and_ disable SSLv3, you can: > + > + * create an SSLContext with the appropriate settings (see > [SSLModule](https://gith

Re: [jclouds-site] Initial strawman for the 1.8.1 release notes (#138)

> +If you are concerned about secure connections, it is almost never a good > idea to use this option in the first place. If you absolutely need to trust > all certificates _and_ disable SSLv3, you can: > + > + * create an SSLContext with the appropriate settings (see > [SSLModule](https://gith

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#581)

[jclouds » jclouds #1836](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1836/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/581#issuecomme

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds » jclouds-labs #1757

See

Re: [jclouds] Fixing Jclouds-509 (#333)

@lahirus Thanks for the note. I'll hold off until the end of next week then (Oct. 31). --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/333#issuecomment-60289412

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-480) support AWS signature version 4 for S3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14181740#comment-14181740 ] Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-480: - [~diwaker] The v2 authorization header has a p

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-480) support AWS signature version 4 for S3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14181741#comment-14181741 ] Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-480: - Amazon announced their Frankfurt region today

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#581)

[jclouds » jclouds #1835](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1835/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/581#issuecomme

Re: [jclouds] Fixing Jclouds-509 (#333)

Okay.. i think this is expecting few more test cases to be completed. I might not able to attend it this week. I'll try to re-send this with test cases ASAP. Thanks. On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Everett Toews wrote: > It's release time in jclouds and that means we like to do a little house

Re: [jclouds-site] Initial strawman for the 1.8.1 release notes (#138)

> +If you are concerned about secure connections, it is almost never a good > idea to use this option in the first place. If you absolutely need to trust > all certificates _and_ disable SSLv3, you can: > + > + * create an SSLContext with the appropriate settings (see > [SSLModule](https://gith

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-labs #1756

See Changes: [Adrian Cole] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" -- [...truncated 2954 lines...] [INFO] Exclude: **/*.eml [INFO] Exclude: **/*.ipr [INFO] Exclude: **/

Re: [jclouds-labs] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#97)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs #1756](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1756/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/j

Re: [jclouds-labs] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#97)

The specific issue here is moving from Objects.toStringHelper to MoreObjects.toStringHelper. The latter class only exists in guava 18, so any release based on master will fail on class not found in many environments. While Objects.toStringHelper is deprecated, it isn't scheduled for removal unt

Re: [jclouds-labs] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#97)

[jclouds-labs-pull-requests #340](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/340/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/97#issuecomment-60277629

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#581)

[jclouds-pull-requests #1324](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1324/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/581#issuecomment-60277431

Re: [jclouds-labs] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#97)

cc @andrewgaul @ccustine @nacx @abayer @andreaturli @everett-toews @ke4qqq @mattstep We'll need a lot of tedious work to fully revert this. I'd estimate about 2-3 days effort. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/97#issuecomment-60

[jclouds-labs] Revert "JCLOUDS-653: Address Guava 18 deprecations" (#97)

This reverts commit b851f0ac3a6fd23720d67dbfad6954b2153bbc4b. The above change made the floor guava version of jclouds latest guava. This is disasterous for compatibility. Note that this is tangled up with types extended from jclouds/jclouds, such as TemplateOptions. Also, I had to hand correct

Re: [jclouds-site] Initial strawman for the 1.8.1 release notes (#138)

> + org.apache.jclouds.apis > + openstack-swift > + 1.8.1 > + > +{% endhighlight %} > + > + > +## API Changes > + > +* [openstack-swift API changes from 1.8.0 to > 1.8.1](api-changes/openstack-swift/) > + > +## Known Issues > + > +* TODO > +* Since, in the majority of cases, jclouds inherits th

Re: [jclouds-site] Initial strawman for the 1.8.1 release notes (#138)

> +1. [Highlights](#highlights) > +1. [API Changes](#api) > +1. [Known Issues](#issues) > +1. [Reminder](#reminder) > +1. [Credits](#credits) > +1. [Test Results](#test) > + > +## Introduction > + > +You can read the official announcement at [Apache jclouds 1.8.1 > released](TODO). You can read th

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#560)

[jclouds » jclouds #1834](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1834/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/560#issuecomme

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#581)

[jclouds-pull-requests #1323](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1323/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/581#issuecomment-60276112

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#581)

[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6 #235](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/235/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/581#issuecomment-60273527

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#581)

done --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/581#issuecomment-60273396

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#581)

[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6 #234](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/234/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/581#issuecomment-60272695

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#581)

i saw, fixed --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/581#issuecomment-60272655

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#581)

@inbarsto There is a Checkstyle failure on the import of the `ZoneToEndpoint` class. Also, I just noticed that we should move the `AvailabilityZone` and `ZoneState` classes to the `org.jclouds.openstack.cinder.v1.domain` package and delete the `org.jclouds.openstack.cinder.v1.domain.zonescoped`

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#560)

[jclouds-pull-requests #1322](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1322/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/560#issuecomment-60272261

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#560)

[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6 #233](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/233/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/560#issuecomment-60270766

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#560)

@inbarsto Oh no, you are not driving me nuts at all! I just wanted to clarify since I noticed 2 PRs and I have not had enough coffee yet this morning. :) Thanks for sticking with this! I do have another Cinder extension related PR that I am submitting this week, so let's get this in and I can

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#560)

yeah i got that a bit late, sorry for the mess Jeremy (pls don't give up on me yet) I already started to create new PR to master and not to a versioned branch this was i think one of the first PR's, the intent is to merge to master as well as 1.8 if possible... sorry for driving u nuts --- Rep

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#560)

Reopened #560. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/560#event-182821789

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#560)

@inbarsto Is this the same as the #581 on the 1.8.x branch? Usually, we commit to master first, _then_ do the backport. If its the same, we can just reopen it. Thx! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/560#issuecomment-60268579

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#560)

why is this closed? its not merged to 1.8 which was the intent :( --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/560#issuecomment-60268110

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] Improved pagination in GCE (#62)

> > - @ConstructorProperties({ "kind", "nextPageToken", "items" }) > - protected ListPage(Kind kind, String nextPageToken, Iterable items) { > - this.kind = checkNotNull(kind, "kind"); > - this.nextPageToken = nextPageToken; > - this.items = items != null ? ImmutableList.copyOf

Re: [jclouds] cinder availability zones api + list call implemented (#560)

Closed #560. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/560#event-182815889

  1   2   >